A load of codswallop! Labour MP’s astonishing outburst at plan to rename Big Ben tower for the Queen – a ‘fifth-generation German’ – by Simon Walters And Brendan Carlin – PUBLISHED: 02:07 GMT, 25 March 2012 | UPDATED: 11:58 GMT, 25 March 2012
Outburst: Ex-miner Ronnie Campbell MP described the Queen as a ‘fifth generation German’
A left-wing Labour MP last night launched a campaign to stop Big Ben tower being renamed the Elizabeth Tower in honour of the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee.
Ex-miner Ronnie Campbell said he resented being ‘ruled over by fifth-generation Germans who changed their name from Battenberg to Windsor’.
The anti-monarchist denounced a plan backed by Tory Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Labour’s Jack Straw to rename the tower containing Big Ben the Elizabeth Tower as ‘a load of codswallop’.
The MP for Blyth Valley in Northumberland said: ‘I don’t think the Queen would want it. She is probably embarrassed.
These MPs are only doing it to suck up to her. Big Ben has always been known as Big Ben and always will be. It is ludicrous to change it.
‘It would be much better to rename Heathrow Airport or the new London skyscraper, The Shard, after her. At least they have been built in her lifetime: Big Ben is older than she is.’
PM chimes in to back calls to rename Big Ben landmark Elizabeth Tower after the Queen
The tower’s official name is the Clock Tower, but it is known universally as Big Ben, the nickname of its bell.
Praise: Despite his anti-Royal views Mr Campbell said now was not the time to abolish the Monarchy, because the Queen was ‘a nice lady’
A lesser-known tower, completed in 1860, was named the Victoria Tower in honour of Queen Victoria.
Time for change? Big Ben may be renamed the Elizabeth Tower
Mr Campbell said: ‘Every socialist bone in my body tells me we should abolish the Monarchy as an outdated institution that nurtures a class system based on birth, not worth.
‘Why should we be ruled over by families descended from robber barons, bandits and illegitimate heirs?
‘Or, in the case of the current lot, fifth-generation Germans who changed their name from Battenberg to Windsor during the First World War.’
Mr Campbell also said the Queen had ‘no right to lord it’ over ordinary working-class people like him.
‘I bend my knee to no one,’ he continued. ‘Without the Monarchy, there would be no aristocrats owning vast swathes of our green and pleasant land simply because their ancestors stole it from the previous occupants.’
Mr Campbell claimed his own family of miners had done more for Britain than the Queen.
‘It is a better legacy than waving from cars and opening Parliament while wearing a heavy crown,’ he said.
But despite his anti-Royal views, now was not the time to abolish the Monarchy, Mr Campbell said, because the Queen was ‘a nice lady’.
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]
But despite his anti-Royal views . . . because the Queen was ‘a nice lady’. . . . (this is a ‘u-turn’ type of article, draw’em in, key’em up then make a sudden u-turn – right at the end in this case. Wow DM how pro-Tory though semi subtle can DM get? The sod just expressed support of the Queen DM, though the title condemns on their behalf. Please report honestly instead of being manipulative, or DM will be insulting the intelligence with all this pro-royal propaganda! NLP closing statement alert!
Germany and France backed by a NORMALIZED and transparent 4th Reich, and a neo-Imperial Frankish Imperator via the EU, should just revive Charlemagne’s Lion Throne (Imperial Capital at Aachen, with vassal Kings in Spain, France and Germany? Africa would be pleased to provide REAL Lions, or would the EU prefer to cast replicas in solid gold for effect as well . . . heck have both . . . would convert a whole lot of weak minded ‘Sand N1ggers’ and ‘Gooks’ to Xianity (if Germany’s neo-paganiss do not dominate the religious scene – Paganism btw is more PC than Xianity) at once . . . WH40K! Emperors don’t die, but become more than the living . . . their children’s iniquities or inaccuracies being punished accordingly, those able to hear would doubtless fight on – in this case for the EU.
. . . though PC EU would probably ferret out those who were victims of proselytization (also what would the neo-nazis and Templars say???) and declare England a mere colony and abolish the monarchy for the English since they need ‘codswallopers’ like Mr.Campbell to throw semi-obvious counter-counter propaganda [ . . . ] those gemstones mentioned earlier would also be returned to the rightful owners [ . . . ] . But would the PC Germans consider the original inhabitants, Irish, Scots and Welsh as the original sovereigns rather than the 5th generation German who waged war AGAINST Germany the motherland in WWII? And if not under consideration for TREASON against Europe, what does the south-eastern portion of the North Atlantic Isles (England), represent but a Barony (see note 1) comprising East Wessex up to South Anglia (North Anglia being Danish territory though originally Scottish) at most?
- Considering that England is only less than one quarter the size of India or the EU
- if India and EU were proper Kingdoms
- Africa and Russia would be true Empire size, China, Europe and Old Rome (the planetary/Archon worshippers under the Legions) barely making the size requirement
- England unless with every other ethnic group’s territory (with Wales, Scotland and Ireland all brutally colonized, probably not considering the German link through the Angle conquest later but maybe under EU auspices, only if those 3 kingdoms want to)
- England on their own (East wessex to South Anglia) would be a Barony.
The long passed Charlemagne would never have allowed a claim of Royal title ahead of a Throneless heart of the EU European Empire and probably led to this inspired backlash. Doubtless the greatest among that era would not tolerate a smaller area led by one of his distant scions to ATTACK Germany (how could they?). Claim sovereignty over what that one still considers sovereign territory via the EU.
Germany and France doubtless will benefit much from close consideration of what Charlemagne would have thought and reinstatement of the Frankish Empire under Constitutional Monarchy (what else is the Western portion of EU after all??? A spiritual continuation of France, Germany and Spain, being vassal Kings under a Frankish Emperor probably to match and equal what the Commonwealth or whats left of the Commonwealth is . . .).
England being quite un-PC though always acting as if England was PC, and not suitably sized to warrant a kingdom title (size wise Charlemagne would never allow the use of the Royal title by such a small territory, even the whole of the Atlantic Isles would probably be a Duchy at most), the English have been so insulting and ‘British’ for so long, that no unity could really count, could under EU, after straigtening out the sovereignty issues with the Triple Crown (of Ireland, Wales and Scotland), re-formalise itself as an independent Barony based from East Wessex to South Anglia region which pledges allegiance to the Imperial Capital of Aachen in Germany (after all the Battenburgs are 5th generation Germans so why keep up the creepy name 1917 change to ‘Windsor’ from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha – thats the REAL name of the ‘English’ Royals btw – pretense, might as well revive House Hanover (truly the last pure English line) as the apex English family which is 100% English pureblood . . . ) with that royal title reduced to one of nobility at most.
The NWO needs reshuffling, the head of EU being a FRANKISH pure blood European from Charlemagne’s Merovingian line if still traceable. EU should also reinstate Old Frankish as the EU’s national and court language, and DROP English which belongs in a small south-eastern corner (much like the Balkans perhaps?) of the North Atlantic Isles as a local dialect instead. Russia, Africa, India and China, could start learning Old Frankish instead of English here on. The other nations worldwide should also learn this language of a potential future Imperial European Court. (Hitler may have been Charlemagne reborn who knows, but society, life experiences and upbringing did not contribute well to the expression of the conquering instinct . . . that and France was no longer close to Germany at that point . . . ). EU is the European (perhaps Imperial European) revival after all with England a vassal fief at very most. The trappings are waiting to be formalized with the re-Imperialisation of Aachen . . . this one’s for good side of Anders Breivik (the Fifth Columnist Outer Breivik, not the Fifth Columnist Killer Breivik . . .) and the good side of Hitler (the Nazi franchise Hitler, not the Nazi-Auswitch Hitler . . .). . . depending on how EU fares, those considered mad in this sick era could true champions be, in a revival . . .
Sultan: Set aside political differences – Friday, 23 March 2012 17:45
SHAH ALAM- The Sultan of Selangor on Monday advised all state lawmakers, regardless of political affiliation, to cooperate with the state administration for the sake of the people’s welfare.
“Political differences shouldn’t be a barrier (for any assemblyperson) to assist the state in (carrying out) measures that would benefit the people,” said Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah when opening the state assembly.
He reminded the elected representatives to put the people’s and state interests before party interest.
He added that lawmakers play a key role in scrutinising policies and programmes to ensure they have a positive impact for both people and the state.
The Sultan also advised lawmakers to debate intellectually, not emotionally, and to voice out the views of the people in the House.
“Every matter (debated in the House) should be judged wisely and fairly, based on the merits and substance of the proposal itself, not just the person who made it,” he said.
He praised the state for achieving 5.9 per cent gross domestic product (GDP) growth last year and attracting RM8.74 billion investments.
However, the Sultan also reminded the Selangor government to protect the state’s forest reserves, water catchment areas and river reserves.
“Encroachment must be eradicated and approval shouldn’t be given for development projects in these areas,” he said in his address.
Finally, the Sultan also cautioned the state to preserve Malay reserve land and prevent it from being transferred to non-Malay individuals or companies.
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]
“Every matter (debated in the House) should be judged wisely and fairly, based on the merits and substance of the proposal itself, not just the person who made it,” the Sultan said.
How does the below sound to the Sultan? Someone who has the ear of the Sultan needs to stress how important the below 3 items are :
1) Freedom from Apartheid/Fascism (Article 1 of the UNHCR, non-Asabiya in Islam, non-”Al-Fitrah”)
2) Freedom from Religious-Persecution/Religious-Supremacy. (Article 18 of the UNHCR, Qur’an 2:256 “let there be no compulsion in religion)
3) Equality for all ethnicities and faiths in all aspects of policy, Law and Constitution.
Would never do to claim double standards against you-know-who, but for certain the 3 items are already well known to the Sultan. Why is this institution being so oblique if not obtuse?
Political differences shouldn’t be a barrier for any assemblyperson to assist the state in carrying on measures that would benefit the people,” but should the state not act as required per the state’s responsibility to remove any such remaining political differences?
The dual system of citizenships based on race and face doubtless make carrying out any measures to benefit the people more difficult. Would be unconscionable for the state to continue these political differences? Tacit approval by inaction only weakens the right and voice of those who should act at a considerate pace. The dual system of citizenships (aka non-Bumi / Bumi) based on race and faith, doubtless make carrying out any measures to benefit the people more difficult.
If the petitioned will not bend to the truth, (do not wait till) then the truth bends the petitioned. The socio-political fallout of this Bumi /non-Bumi divide is very serious as of now, and cannot be ignored. Let Malaysia adhere to what being a signatory of UNHCR Article 1 requires, and consider the disenfranchisement of non-Muslim and non-Malay citizens who have always been forthcoming and supportive of the institution that keeps Malaysian flaws uncorrected. Act in the interest of humanity, be Royalty to all men not just men of your own ethnicity or own faith. Continued neglect to address these issues is unconscionable.
Sultan Idris said set aside political differences via Article 1 of the UNHCR. Well The best way to to this is to end apartheid. Religious difference can also be ended but this will need Article 18 of the UNHCR. Who better than the Royal Collective of Malaysian Princes to make the initiative? We’re not waiting for a 10,000 B.C. (2008 Roland Emmerich) or Arab Spring now are we? These are basic human rights elucidated in the UNHCR, shall we all leave the 3rd World status behind from here on . . .
“AND WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU (you here refers to any formally converted Muslim person) THAT YOU (you here refers to any any formally converted Muslim person who has consensually in full awareness and without coercion and in free will embraced that faith) FIGHT NOT IN THE CAUSE OF ALLAH, AND FOR THOSE WEAK , ILL TREATED AND OPPRESSED AMONG MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, WHOSE CRY IS: “OUR LORD! RESCUE US FROM THIS TOWN WHOSE PEOPLE ARE OPPRESSORS; AND RAISE FOR US FROM YOU ONE WHO WILL PROTECT, AND RAISE FOR US FROM YOU (you here refers to any formally converted Muslim person) ONE (one here refers to any formally converted Muslim person who has consensually in full awareness and without coercion and in free will embraced that faith) WHO WILL HELP.” SURAH AN-NISA -verse 75
“THE ONE WHO WORKS FOR ASABIYA, CALLS FOR ASABIYA OR FIGHTS FOR ASABIYA IS NOT ONE OF US….AND HE IS LIKE THE (censored in case of lese majeste) WHO LIVES IN (censored in case of lese majeste)“. PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH). 14+ centuries on, the Quran can be applied, well in obvious cases like these at any rate.
Asabiyyah is most strong in the nomadic phase, and decreases as civilization advances. As this Asabiyyah declines, another more compelling Asabiyyah may take its place; thus, civilizations rise and fall, and history describes these cycles of Asabiyyah as they play out. – Ibn Khaldun, Tunisian Ruler and Historiographer.