BEIJING: High-speed trains linking China’s two main cities Beijing and Shanghai make their commercial debut Thursday — a step seen as vital to ease pressures on the country’s overloaded transport system.
The $33 billion rail line, which has been operating on a trial basis since mid-May, will halve the journey time to under five hours and could hurt airlines operating on the busy route plagued by delays and cancellations. The fast link, which has been hit by safety concerns and graft, is opening a year ahead of schedule and will be able to carry 80 million passengers a year — double the current capacity on the 1,318-kilometre (820-mile) route. “It could play a transformational role in shaping the future economic dynamics in coastal China… by creating more spillover effects to regions lying along the sprawling high-speed railway line,” Ren Xianfang, an analyst at IHS Global Insight , told AFP. But for the airline industry, the impact could be “destructive”, she warned. One-way ticket prices will range between 410 and 1,750 yuan ($63-$270) subject to further adjustments, vice rail minister Hu Yadong said earlier this month, compared with about 1,300 yuan for a flight between the two cities. Anxious about losing passengers to the new line, airlines have slashed some ticket prices by as much as 65 per cent to below the cost of the cheapest rail pass, state media said Wednesday, citing figures from travel website ctrip.com. But Frederic Campagnac, the general manager of transport and logistics consultancy Clevy China, believes the fast link will have a positive impact on airlines by forcing operators to be on time. It will “put pressure on the airlines to keep more on their schedule,” Campagnac said.
Work on the high-speed railway started in April 2008 with a planned investment of 220.9 billion yuan. China has invested heavily in its high-speed rail network, which spanned 8,358 kilometres at the end of 2010 and is expected to exceed 13,000 kilometres by 2012 and 16,000 kilometres by 2020. But huge investment has also made the sector a hotbed for corruption, which has raised concerns over the costs and safety of the high-speed rail links. China’s state auditor in March revealed that construction companies and individuals had last year siphoned off 187 million yuan in funds meant for the Beijing-Shanghai link. This followed the sacking of former railways minister Liu Zhijun in February, who had allegedly taken more than 800 million yuan in kickbacks over several years on contracts linked to China’s high-speed rail network. The railway ministry has said the trains would run between 250 and 300 kilometres per hour on the Beijing-Shanghai link, although the line is designed for a maximum speed of 380 kph. The speed is in line with a nationwide directive made public in April that said all high-speed trains must run at a slower pace than previously announced — no faster than 300 kph — to make journeys safer. Despite the slower speeds, urban areas located within 300-400 kilometres of Beijing and Shanghai “will become kind of suburbs to the big cities” because it will be possible to do a return trip in one day, Campagnac said. “All the cities on the way will benefit from the line,” he said.
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]
Suggestion to the PRC on solution to cost and affordability issues. Equitable Charge System – 12 trips (2 per day for a 6 day week) will be calculated to cost a flat 10% of salary. Hence each trip TO AND FROM **ANY** location, should at very most only cost 0.8.3% of what a person earns rather than a flat rate that can come up to 5% or even 20% of a lower income person’s monthly salary to effectively prevent a poorer person from travelling to Beijing or Shanghai even ONCE a month perhaps for leisure. Even at this level of pricing consider that by the 100th trip one makes in a single month, one would have spent a whopping 83% of one’s salary in total which is extreme. Hence the cost of using what is supposed to be a public facility would not be considered cheap as well. All jobless people should have FREE access as a matter of compassionate governance. Imagine a person who is looking for a job. He cannot afford to pay for a ticket. This one-way ticket prices will range between 410 and 1,750 yuan ($63-$270) is WAAAY above the affordability of most lower income earners equal to an entire month’s salary in some cases. If the railway was intended for ALL citizens of China including the 2000-3000 yuan and below earners, then please use the above earnings based * ” Percentage of Salary Calculated ” * system instead. The cost of the ticket is extreme. Finally, for the wealthier that do use the rail, their higher 0.83% calculated against their salary IS MOST Socialist in nature and *directly* distributes wealth according to Socialist methods. Reconsider the system or at the very least allow a weekly complimentary 2 way trip to all 3000 yuan and below earners so that they can see and shuttle between their beloved Capitals as freemen of this post-Cultural-Revolution, post-millenial era in China’s history. Otherwise this neglect of the pricing system will make any initiatives towards wealth distribution or the espousal of Socialism MEANINGLESS. If public transport is inaccessible to the public, what is the point of building it?