marahfreedom

Archive for January 20th, 2012|Daily archive page

First and Only Post ever on Woofer – by @AgreeToDisagree – 2nd Jan 2011

In Uncategorized on January 20, 2012 at 8:41 pm

Look here you said this wasn’t a Tweeter, but when you have  ‘Tweet this’ button, the contradiction is horrible. Could you change that ‘Tweet This’ button to a ‘Woof This’ button?

Let me tell you though that ROARER with a ‘Roar This’ button will climb over the heads on all those ‘Woofers’ on leashes. Fine a bird merely tweets, can’t do damage a dog can. But dogs are on leashes, have no rights in society are at the mercy of being neutered (if not already so) all the time and are no great icon of freedom.

Woofer is one step up from Twitter but not good enough by above embedded listed meanings. Even Roarer could be less effective simply being ‘beastial’ (Lions can’t socialise in Human society and do little else than be caged, eat and procreate) . . .

‘Commenter’ while human of course, is not very interesting though, you’d find each type of communication site will have it’s fans and does show what kind of people they are.

Twitter = Airheads who allow themselves to be squeezed into 140 words.

Woofer = Technicality/semantics/NLP unaware buffs who allow themselves to be forced into keying in 1400 words. What a mockery. Do the site owners not know that sometimes people can post something meaningful less than1400 words? How lame and intentionally irritating can website conceptualists get?

Roarer = Leaders who are NLP unaware buffs – 14,000 words should be tolerable for the most verbose among commentators. And if 14K is the minimum post, don’t expect many postings and a tiny community of academics or extra ‘typey’ sorts. You’re still an animal. Animals have no souls by Monotheism. So who needs to be associated with posts that have no soul?

Finally, and the best choice, ‘Commenter’ = For real people that make intelligible comments of ANY length, and are not into all that ‘kitsch on the backs of animals’ thing (this is kinda porn format if anything, nothing against porn tho).

The other 3 are like sugar coating veggies so that children will eat with a fly thrown in (A fly that says 140 or less if not 1400 or more). You’re building a linguistic dystopia with such idiot named or idiot expression limited sites. Don’t tell us how short or long to post, that’s for us to decide ya creeps. Grow up and stop getting on the nerves of people with any common sense.

Twitter is for Twits? Woofer is for Woofs. As Nutter is for Nuts. There is also the sex oriented ‘Twatter’ for ‘Twats’. Hatter (Mad) . . . Tweeter would sound better but Twit? No thanks, the NLP associability kills Twitter for moi . . .

Advertisements

Orthodox Judaism treats women like filthy little things By Yossi Sarid – Haaretz.com – 30th December 2011

In Uncategorized on January 20, 2012 at 8:38 pm

If a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they’ll save the man, ‘who is obligated to perform more commandments,’ whereas a woman’s ‘wisdom is only in the spindle.’ In fact, ‘words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women.’

If you would like to know the source from which your brothers derive their brazen behavior, go over to the study hall and open a page of Talmud. It’s true that the Torah has 70 faces, but the trend of these faces is clear: The source of the pollution is in halakha (Jewish law ) itself. What is happening in Beit Shemesh and its satellites is not “contrary to halakha,” it is mandated by halakha. And the rest will be told to the grandmothers, daughters and granddaughters.

Anyone ignoramus knows that the Torah’s “ways are ways of pleasantness,” that “the honor of a king’s daughter is within,” and that “proper behavior comes before the Torah,” but it’s worth knowing more. It’s worth knowing that a woman is unfit to be a judge, and is also unfit to give testimony. She is unfit for any public position with authority. “Thou shalt appoint a king over thee” – a king and not a queen.

A daughter, commanded the sages, must not be taught Torah, because “the mind of woman is not suited to be taught, but [only] to words of nonsense.” Women are light-minded and have little knowledge.

And if a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they’ll save the man, “who is obligated to perform more commandments,” whereas a woman’s “wisdom is only in the spindle.” In fact, “words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women.”

A man must say three blessings every day during morning prayers: He thanks God “that He didn’t make me a gentile, that He didn’t make me a woman, that He didn’t make me an ignoramus.” And it’s not proper to speak to a woman too much, since “all her conversation is nothing but words of adultery,” and whoever talks to her too much “causes evil to himself and will end up inheriting hell.” And let’s not even talk about the fate of someone “who looks even at a woman’s little finger.”

The extremists who spit at women, who call themselves Sikarikim, learned their lesson 101 times and learned it well: A husband would do well not to let his wife go outside, into the street, and should restrict her outings “to once or twice a month, as necessary, since a woman has no beauty except by sitting in the corner of her house.”

Because inside the house – very deep inside – her glorious honor awaits her: “Every woman washes her husband’s face and feet and pours him a cup and prepares his bed and stands and serves her husband. And any woman who refrains from doing any of these tasks that she is obligated to perform – is forced to do them.” Some recommend forcing her with a whip or by starvation “until she gives in.”

And needless to say, she is at her husband’s disposal whenever he is overcome by a desire “to satisfy his urges with her.” And if she continues to rebel, he always has the right “to divorce her without her consent.”

And there are many similar halakhot, only a few of which we have collected here. Nor have we cited everything in the name of the ones who said them, for lack of space. The readers are invited to find the references on Shabbat – and to browse around – on their own; this is a good opportunity for study. We will direct your attention to Tractate Shabbat, which does a good job of summing up halakha’s attitude toward women: “a sack full of excrement” with a bleeding hole.

Some people will seek to console themselves: It’s true that this is the halakha both m’doraita (from the Torah ) and m’drabanan (from the rabbis ), but that is not what is taught nowadays. But it suffices to listen to the sermon the sage Rabbi Ovadia Yosef delivered five years ago, based on the well-known halakhic work “Kitzur Shulchan Aruch”: “A man must take care not to walk between two women or between two dogs or two pigs, and men should also not allow a woman or a dog or a pig to walk between them.”

Treating women as impure and filthy begins with halakha and continues with actions. As long as the religious and ultra-Orthodox parties – Shas, United Torah Judaism, Habayit Hayehudi and National Union, none of which have any women in the Knesset – are not disqualified, their nakedness will continue to sing out and the nakedness of the land will be revealed.

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

And any woman who refrains from doing any of these tasks that she is obligated to perform – is forced to do them.”

Divorce and brand. Who needs to force?

Demoguery? They can’t really be that crass. They could allow a handful to study Torah rather than all and sundry and only based on their suitability and personality and only after all demands for marriages be met. There will always be some whores as there will be the chaste and virgins suitable to read Torah.

Israel was redeemed from Egypt by virtue of its (Israel’s) righteous women[8] I think Israel needs to reserve a few women for the Torah.

In either case Judaism was based on the exiled Egyptian priesthood led by du-Mose then later formalized by Egyptian skill base trained Solomon. In 1800 bc Judaism was founded. Aramea produced it’s local version in Xianity in 0 CE. The Bedouin in 600s CE. Just a religious franchise though a good one, but roots are roots, and Judaism was and is the EGYPTIAN priesthood.

Return to Egypt and serve any Pharoah that arises, this Pharoah will subsume all Caucasians who partook of the system in Masonry and ‘occultism’. Egyptian Pantheons will be revived and with genetic science . . . you can guess the rest.

Study The Ennead, The Ogdoad or even the Book of the Dead, for roots and similariries in Judaic ‘Mysteries’, these were Egyptian mysteries that the Sorceror King Solomon mastered.

Welcome to 2042 – the year when Britain is no more than a memory By Peter Hitchens Last updated at 10:11 PM on 31st December 2011

In Socialism on January 20, 2012 at 8:34 pm

The New Year has always seemed to me to be a time for enjoying a bit of gloom. So in the spirit of hearty pessimism, I’d like to take you forward 30 years, for an imaginary peep into the pages of the ‘China Daily’ of January 1, 2042. You can judge for yourselves how imaginary it really is. ‘Cabinet papers issued today by the state archives of the People’s Republic cast an interesting light on the final years of the country formerly known as Great Britain. Younger readers should know that, 30 years ago, this once-important nation (now dissolved) occupied the vacation islands, famous for their mild climate and their picturesque historical theme parks, which lie off our far western coast. Signing Britain over: Will David Cameron and Nick Clegg prove to be the UK’s last leadership team? ‘A memo from Prime Minister David Cameron to his deputy, Nicholas Clegg, runs in part “…and thanks so much, Nick, for your continuing self-sacrifice in our joint cause. I’m so sorry you have to put up with those moronic cartoons portraying you as the junior partner when – as we both well know – this is a liberal government in which I am happy to let you get your way. ‘?“

I am especially grateful for your recent performance, a fine piece of acting. The dim old buffers who still vote for my party, however many times we let them down, were genuinely taken in, and thought a) that I had struck a blow for Britain in Brussels and b) that you were angry about it.” ‘There are also memos to the Interior Minister of the time, Theresa May, congratulating her for “sounding as if you really mean to do something about crime and immigration” and a ruder one to the Justice Minister, Kenneth Clarke, chiding him for “letting the cat out of the bag: it won’t do, old boy! Can’t you just be satisfied with getting your way? There’s no need to gloat in public.” ‘A letter from Mr Cameron to Alex Salmond, leader of the Scottish government, is strangely friendly, given Mr Cameron’s frequent public assertions that he was against Scottish independence. Experts from the University of Shanghai have concluded that Mr Cameron secretly wanted a Scottish breakaway as the only chance of his party ever again winning an Election on its own.’

The China Daily continues: ‘No trace can be found of any serious plans to reform the country’s disastrous state schools, nor to curb its out-of-control welfare system, known to be widely abused by criminals and to encourage parasitical sloth. ‘As for the economy, the archives contain only a plaintive note from the Finance Minister to the Premier, bearing the words, “There’s no money!” Hard act to follow: Official documents may show that Theresa May put in a convincing performance, even if she was undermined by Kenneth Clarke ‘The documents make it plain that the governing class of the country formerly known as Great Britain had no idea how to cope with the problems they faced and were mainly obsessed with public relations. In the light of this, the events of the next 20 years should have come as no surprise.’ I don’t recall Dickens writing an Estuary English soap opera Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations is one of the best books ever written. David Lean’s 1946 realisation of it is one of the best films ever made – not least because so much of its dialogue is taken direct from the original. So why is the BBC’s new adaptation so astonishingly, disappointingly, ridiculously bad? It is because the BBC is so full of people who simply refuse to admit that they have anything to learn from the past. In their world, all drama must be either Doctor Who or EastEnders (or in this case a combination of the two). Ridiculously bad: A young Pip and Miss Havisham in the series Pip Pirrip, raised in a blacksmith’s cottage, could not possibly have grown up to look like a male model. Herbert Pocket was never a vicious snob. Miss Havisham was a yellow-skinned, deranged hag, not a self-harming young woman. Estella was an unattainable beauty – not a stroppy person with the adenoidal voice and the scowling visage of an affronted North London social worker. Britain’s greatest author: The work of Charles Dickens always prompts an emotional reaction – unlike the efforts of today’s television scriptwriters Perhaps above all, Joe Gargery was a man of almost saintly goodness and humour, rather than the glum and self-righteous person in this TV travesty, who always looks as if he’s just off to a Chartist meeting. I reread the opening chapters of the book to reassure myself about this and was repeatedly convulsed with laughter and moved close to tears. The TV version produced no emotion at all and resorted to incessant loud music to tell us how we should have been feeling. The vandals behind it also managed to insert a scene in a brothel – perhaps they can tell me where this occurs in the book. Dickens, being a proper writer, managed to envelop the foul figure of Bentley Drummle in a cloud of evil without any such crudities. And the script was full of modern soap opera language, often in Estuary English quite unlike the speech of the time – ‘con man’, ‘close the deal’, ‘he owes me’.

Yes, of course you need to make changes when you adapt an immense book into three hours of drama. But you need to stay close to the truth of the original, or you are destroying it. Something similar is now happening to Sherlock Holmes thanks to the half-witted cinema versions. In an age when few read any more, this third-rate stuff is in danger of replacing greatness with cut-price hogwash. A Canadian judge has ruled that a teenager was under the influence of an ‘antidepressant’ when he knifed a close friend to death. Judge Robert Heinrichs was told in his Winnipeg court that the killer (also a user of cannabis and cocaine) grew more irrational once prescribed the ‘antidepressant’. ‘He had become irritable, restless, agitated, aggressive and unclear in his thinking,’ the judge said. ‘In that state he overreacted in an impulsive, explosive and violent way’. Now off the drug, he was ‘simply not the same in behaviour or character’. It is a painful case, but it underlines the urgent need for a proper inquiry into these widely used pills. We’re making North Korea worse Small politicians try to look big by exaggerating the size and the danger of their foes. The West’s ridiculous attitude to North Korea is an example of this. I have been there, and can report that this bankrupt, starving statelet is so poor it cannot even warm its own government buildings and must have used up much of its petrol reserves to stage the funeral of its deceased leader. Its rulers are trapped in their palace. If they show weakness, they will be torn to pieces by their hungry, disillusioned subjects. Above all, they need a way out. If we do not help provide one they will, in the end, have to collapse into the arms of China. Show of strength or sign of weakness? Although thousands turned out for the funeral of North Korea’s Kim Jong-Il, the country is in fact incredibly poor Why should we want that? Yet we continue to portray this sad survival as a major power and adopt a high moral tone in our dealings with it. Yes, it can still do harm – but it is much more likely to do so if we maintain our current policy.

 

 

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

Try making friends with Germany and EU first before thinking North Korea. If England cannot even get the IRA on their side much less return so many stolen gems during the colonial era, England which even alienated America in the War of Independence and has historiacally insulted the Germans and French and even Spanish for decades, has no business talking about preventing North Korea from collapsing into the arms of China. Korea is not even collapsing (yet, and China probably will see it won’t unless a false flag to kick out South Koreas puppets is intended), this is a Confucian region – North East Asia, you guys are white lost your original faith system, have had a history of colonialism and have bullied North Korea and a slew of nations no end. Who needs a country like that who won’t apologise, won’t admit wrongs and send reparations for wartime atrocities including DRUG PEDDLING – enmasse. Africa alone could well break England’s finances for 1000 years in reparations, much less India and China AND the Middle East. And now the English are eyeing North Korea? North Korea is the bad cop as of now in this region that USA might be loathe to attack, what makes England think China won’t feel such aired thoughts are targetted at China and react appropriately? Solve your own backyard issues first, and these go back a few hundred years with the last pureblood English monarch in 1700s leaving no real English royalty since. North Korea is China’s or at very most South Korea’s business, hardly England’s territory when even USA is effectively not even in the picture as far as North Korea is concerned. If North Korea snubs South Korea calling it a puppet of the USA, England’s association with military adventurism in the Middle East makes it no better.

Pope to attack ‘moral vacuum’ that caused summer riots in New Year’s Day speech By Daily Mail Reporter Last updated at 2:01 AM on 31st December 2011

In Abuse of Power, Sexuality on January 20, 2012 at 8:30 pm

The Pope will launch a renewed attack on the ‘moral relativism’ he has blamed for Britain’s summer riots.

Pope Benedict will say in tomorrow’s New Year’s Day message that neither peace nor justice are obtainable if the values expressed in the Ten Commandments are rejected.

His words represent another severe criticism of moral relativism, the humanistic creed that holds there can be no objective standard on which to base morality.
Scathing message: Pope Benedict XVI will attack ‘moral relativism’ which he blames for the summer riots

Scathing message: Pope Benedict XVI will attack ‘moral relativism’ which he blames for the summer riots

They come months after the Pope told Nigel Baker, Britain’s Ambassador to the Holy See, that the spread of the ideology was to blame for the August riots, saying it caused ‘frustration, despair, selfishness, disregard for life and liberty’.

He said that every person ‘must move beyond the relativistic horizon and come to know the truth about himself and the truth about good and evil’.

‘Deep within his conscience, man discovers a law that he did not lay upon himself, but which he must obey,’ he says in his written message, entitled Educating Young People in Justice and Peace.

‘Its voice calls him to love and to do what is good, to avoid evil and to take responsibility for the good he does and the evil he commits.’

Pope Benedict has taught the significance of the natural moral law throughout his seven-year pontificate.

Root of the riots: The Pontiff says the ideology causes frustration and despair

According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, this law is considered natural because it is part of the nature of a person, inscribed on every human heart and enabling people to good from evil, and truth from falsehood.

His message adds: ‘The exercise of freedom is intimately linked to the natural moral law, which is universal in character, expresses the dignity of every person and forms the basis of fundamental human rights and duties.

‘The right use of freedom, then, is central to the promotion of justice and peace, which require respect for oneself and others, including those whose way of being and living differs greatly from one’s own.

‘This attitude engenders the elements without which peace and justice remain merely words without content: mutual trust, the capacity to hold constructive dialogue, the possibility of forgiveness, which one constantly wishes to receive but finds hard to bestow, mutual charity, compassion towards the weakest, as well as readiness to make sacrifices.’

He will also hit out at the promotion of individualism, through which a person ‘ends up contradicting the truth of his own being and forfeiting his freedom’.

He adds: ‘On the contrary, man is a relational being, who lives in relationship with others and especially with God’.

Pope Benedict ends his message by addressing young people directly, encouraging them to work hard and pursue a life of ‘humility and dedication.

The Pontiff ends his message for the 2012 World Peace Day of January 1 by addressing young people, encouraging them to work hard and pursue a life of ‘humility and dedication’.

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

Save for the attack on individualism which is the basis for preventation of stagnation, this article reads well. Religions are a massive franchise and tool of control likely instututed by rulers in 0 bc and earlier if not to foster a love for one’s own tribe. Individualism is the single most important thing, and we will be confounded and pleased by the so many or so few others that are exactly the same as us. Viewed from the pope’s viewpoint of negative relationism, positive relationism needs to be fostered, not submitted to by individuals for society to progress.

The mouthpiece of the 2011 year old Egregor encapsulated as the dead spirit of Christ speaks some sense, though one would never know if this Pope has ever channelled that spirit of Christ he claims to know. Ecclesiastical politics would see to it that it is impossible to achieve the spirituality to do so! It is non-relational or individualistic conscience that ensures the above values.

Some of us sought these voices for decades (and found only the World would respond), others went through the motions and played the ‘political game in Church’ instead to reach papal power which is a zero if that pedo defender reputation does not end or reparations other than Church closures are not made.

Without knowing all sides, a religion can never move forward, how about switching over to obviously copied wholesale trinity of Ilia, Remus and Romulus gentrified from and spliced with Judaism?

A nice Wolfskin wearing Pope bearing a Wolf ivory stave (after clearing all the pedo nonsense honestly and without favour) could do much more to galvanise the Roman Empire region of this day, not the brimstone of Aramea which is not even native to Rome and it’s planetary (Archonic) deities, Aramaic is not the Italian language or culture, and the vast richness of culture that native Roman faiths had is not Aramaic in nature nor should it be fusion-culture if Romans are proud of their origins (the Holy Trinity of Ilia, Remus and Romulus) . . .

Greek central banker says return to drachma would be hell December 31, 2011

In Democracy, Equality, Invasive Laws, Plutocracy, Property, social freedoms, Socialism, Wealth distribution on January 20, 2012 at 8:28 pm

ATHENS, Dec 31 — Greece would suffer disastrous consequences if it ditched the euro for the drachma, the country’s central banker said in a newspaper interview, warning that such a move would result in a massive devaluation.

“A return to the drachma would mean real hell, at least in the first years,” George Provopoulos, governor of the Bank of Greece, said in an interview with Sunday’s Kathimerini newspaper. “Living standards would plunge. The new currency would be significantly devalued, possibly by up to 60-70 per cent.”

Debt-saddled Greece, which joined the euro in 2001, is struggling to meet the bailout terms set by its international lenders and could default if there is no deal with private bondholders on a debt restructuring before March.

Greece is negotiating a bond swap scheme which is a pivotal part of a second, €130-billion bailout package agreed by euro zone leaders in October. The restructuring aims to cut its debt by €100 billion (RM409 billion) and render it more manageable.

Athens faces bond redemptions of €14.5 billion ($188.23 billion)in March.

Provopoulos said proponents of a return to the drachma were wrong because it would bring the country back decades and undo significant progress.

“I don’t believe Greeks would want to experience such a nightmare scenario which would entail huge risks for the country’s security,” he was quoted as saying. “I am certain that Greeks would not allow a return to the distant past.”

A Kapa Research poll for Sunday’s To Vima newspaper showed more than 77 per cent of Greeks want the coalition government to do all it takes to ensure the country stays in the euro zone, a bloc that now includes 17 countries.

Banks and investment funds have been negotiating with Athens for weeks on a so-called private sector involvement scheme under which they will accept a nominal 50 per cent write-down on their Greek bond holdings in return for a mix of cash and new bonds.

If all ends well, Greece will reduce its debt-to-GDP burden from 160 per cent to 120 per cent by 2020. Failure to reach a deal could trigger wider fallout in the euro zone, which has been trying to cope with a spreading debt crisis.

Echoing these concerns, Greece‘s outgoing representative at the International Monetary Fund, Panagiotis Roumeliotis, told Kathimerini newspaper that Greece could not afford an unsuccessful outcome in talks on the new bailout.

“If the new funding is not secured in time, anything can happen including a default, which h could open the way for Greece‘s exit from the euro zone,” Roumeliotis told the paper.

Gikas Hardouvelis, chief economic adviser to Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos, told Real News he was optimistic that the bond swap talks would reach a favourable outcome. — Reuters

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

Disastrous?  Not really. Bond swap talks are absolute nonsense have no basis in reality. Think “real goods” and “real services”, not monetised debt. If the European Union won’t have Greece or give Greece a fair deal, and Greece returns to it’s own currency like the English retain their pound, Greece could well get the BRICS nations with cash to spare to underwrite them in exchange for various trade and perhaps even trade distribution point or tax concessions, alongside the PIIGS to ensure a viable country with it’s own currency.

Much fiscal autonomy could be lost for a few decades perhaps, but PIIGS nations like Greece would not end up backwoods with depressed economies and enslaved Grecian migrants working in developed EU countries to instead become entrepot or distribution economies, or even be peopled by wealthy migrants from BRICS nations who will doubtless invest and develop the PIIGS nations.

BRICS could ensure PIIGS each have their own currencies AND survive. Who knows even ensure supplies of food and useful goods at special prices to enable Greece and the PIIGS nations to continue their quality of life.

More importantly, it is very dangerous if a Multipolar World Order does not persist. Any hegemony worldwide will result in eventual loss of autonomy by Greece and PIIGS in time anyway so why not be direct challengers of the Euro having own currencies by getting BRICS to underwrite (even effectively take over the financial system) and do wonders over the next few decades? Politically doubtless, the Socialism angle could very well fit into BRICS nations like China and Russia.

How about dropping Capitalism for Socialism with Grecian characteristics? China and Greece are also polytheistic countries with ancient histories, doubtless a good match and probably Greece could learn much about being as successful as China under socialism as uncontrolled Capitalism has it’s heart in the US Fed reserve (nominally also occult Zionism/Illuminism/Masonry) and only views Greece as a underling, not like an equal as China might.

Culturally, it is impossible to be colonized by BRICS nations, as differences and genotypes are clearly visible, and the spin off could be that the PIIGS instead of becoming lost causes and under European (Fed Reserve Global Banking Cartel) control, become powerhouses in EU out of necessity to the BRICS instead. From subject to ruler, Greece, think!

At the end of these few decades, PIIGS could well be controlling the EU instead of the other way around in as soon as a year and at that point could work something else out with the BRICS again – though friendship would have grown much during that time.

Greece should choose the path of moderation in Socialism (wealth distribution, welfare etc..) rather than uncontrolled unsustainable Capitalism (i.e. golder parachutes, globalist controlled quangocrats, etc.) where sequestration of wealth by a handful of plutocrats and cult of personality persist while 99% of the population languish under an increasingly oppressive system of laws and unaccountability.

Greece could lead PIIGS to dominance over EU rather than capitulate to the IMF or World Bank or whatever Fed Reserve Banking Cartel to be equals with BRICS investors as well as give mankind a Multipolar World Order, a safer alternative to a single Banking Cartel / NATO backed hegemon that leads to Iraqs and Pakistans. Take a visit to Iraq and Pakistan then ask them about Capitalism or hegemony for a better idea Greece. Then talk to BRICS, the above suggestion makes perfect sense.

At the end of these few decades, PIIGS could well be controlling the EU instead of the other way around . . .

‘I blame it on my genes’ – by John Stevens – 7th September 2011

In Uncategorized on January 20, 2012 at 7:46 pm

700lb Californian woman enters the record books as the world’s fattest woman After reaching 700 pounds, Pauline Potter has officially entered the record books as the world’s heaviest woman. But the 47-year-old from Sacramento, California, now says she wants to lose weight so she can enjoy every day life again. Mrs Potter had boasted that men think she is a ‘sex goddess’ and she has ‘fantastic sex every day’, but she now struggles with daily life and cannot turn over in bed and or fit in her car. Record breaker: Pauline Potter has entered the Guinness Book of Records as the world’s heaviest living woman Record breaker: Pauline Potter has entered the Guinness Book of Records as the world’s heaviest living woman She wants to lose as much as 500 pounds in order to be able to go dancing, go on road trips and fit in seats at the theatre. The world record holder, who currently weighs 643 pounds, blames her upbringing as the main reason for her size. She said that being overweight is in her genes and that as a child there was an ‘overabundance’ of food. ‘My mom was over 400 pounds and my dad over 600,’ she said. ‘I have eight siblings all which are over 300, except one.

This big: Mrs Potter weighed 700 pounds at her peak Difficulty: Mrs Potters says that she struggled to get dressed This big: Mrs Potter weighed 700 pounds at her peak and hopes to lose up to 500 pounds In the pool: Mrs Potter goes swimming between three and five times a week at a warm water therapy pool where she does lengths to keep mobile In the pool: Mrs Potter goes swimming between three and five times a week at a warm water therapy pool where she does lengths to keep mobile ‘We were just raised, that if it was happy we’d celebrate with food, if it was sad, oh you fell down and skinned your knee, here’s ice-cream.’

Mrs Potter said that she has repeatedly postponed losing weight, but has decided it is now time to do something about her size as daily life is becoming very difficult and she has to rely on her son for help. ‘Everything is difficult from getting dressed to taking a bath,’ she said. ‘To reaching, you know, I can’t put my own socks on. ‘As far as my daily activity I do, everything is very difficult and thank goodness I have a very good relationship with my son and he is very helpful. He helps me do anything that’s difficult.’ Before she was fat: Mrs Potter thinks the roots of her obesity lie in her childhood and her genes Before she was fat: Mrs Potter thinks the roots of her obesity lie in her childhood and her genes Before she was fat: Mrs Potter thinks the roots of her obesity lie in her childhood and her genes

Growing up: Mrs Potter said that her family used to turn to food for both celebrations and commiserations Growing up: Mrs Potter said that her family used to turn to food for both celebrations and commiserations The Californian mother tries to keep mobile by going to a warm water rehabilitation pool three to five times a week where she does laps. But she has to use a mobility scooter to get around and can no longer get into her car. Mrs Potter said that one of her problems is that she likes all foods, except sauerkraut and Brussels sprouts, and said she has food every one or two hours.

‘I’d be happy at 200 [pounds] maybe 300 but probably more 200 would be my ideal weight,’ she said. Support: Mrs Potter said that she relies on her son for help doing everyday things that she cannot do along with her sisters Support: Mrs Potter said that she relies on her son for help doing everyday things that she cannot do along with her sisters Too big: Mrs Potter cannot get in her car any more so has to use a mobility scooter to get around Too big: Mrs Potter cannot get in her car any more so has to use a mobility scooter to get around

Too big: Mrs Potter cannot get in her car any more so has to use a mobility scooter to get around Record books: Mrs Potter is featured in the new Guinness Book of Records Record books: Mrs Potter is featured in the new Guinness Book of Records ‘I would be in seventh heaven. I could dance, I could go watch Baseball games, I could walk into a Theatre and sit in the seats, I could go on road trips again with my son, we could go to Reno and gamble.’ Mrs Potter is looking for a nutritionist and doctor to help her, but said she also has the support of her network of friends online. ‘I have a lot of friends online,’ she said. ‘I go online there’s a support group on there with other heavy friends, so we talk quite a bit online, we exchange phone numbers, we talk on the phone or we email.’ Mrs Potter said she regrets getting as big as she has and would not recommend her lifestyle to anyone. ‘I don’t even know how to say, it’s not fun, it’s not fun at all,’ she said. ‘There is no physical freedom.’ ‘As far as even rolling over in the bed. Thank goodness I have an electric hospital bed, and I can grab on to the bars to roll over. ‘I am mobile to a certain extent but it’s difficult. I just struggle every day to hang on to what little bit of mobility I have. It’s very hard.’ For more amazing records check out the new Guinness World Records 2012 out on September 15th. Visit http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com for more information

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

For love of diversity, I suggest the fattest breed with the fattest (also thinnest with thinnest). Losing fat people in society would be like losing a distinct species of animal or plant. They may not be the best or healthiest specimens of humanity but equally valid and rebuke to those who would force everyone to look like clones of the way governments impose their will on what is acceptable or not (as if to avoid bullying one neede to be less than fat, looks horrible to some of us, but thats the challenge to those attempting to impose a mono-system that threatens conformity and uniformity.

You challenge the system by being fat so you are a hero! Mob mentality is nonsense and a tool of control even in preferences in aesthetics, so keep eating to the limits of health in a way that does not affect longevity! Don’t blame it on your genes, treasure those genes and attenuate them by breeding with even fatter (but healthy) people! This is not for everyone but if there was anyone who needed to build on what they have, Pauline Potter is just such an example !

Suddenly pro-Chinese Nazri: Very “jantan” but insulting – by Robert Phang – 6th September 2011

In Uncategorized on January 20, 2012 at 7:42 pm

This was followed by the article preceding this one in the discussion area. Suddenly pro-Chinese Nazri: Very “jantan” but insulting, says Robert Phang I am amused by the statement made by Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz, the so-called de facto Minister for Law, who declared that he would fight tooth and nail to ensure Chinese representation in a Barisan Nasional (BN) government even if the Chinese component party, namely MCA fails to secure a single parliamentary seat in the coming polls.

That seems to be a truly “Jantan” statement in championing the Chinese cause. If that statement is supposed to elevate Nazri Aziz in the eyes of the Chinese community, then he is mistaken. That statement would in fact constitute an insult to the Chinese electorates. Who is Nazri to make such offers if the Chinese voters have rejected this Chinese-centric component party? Who appointed Nazri to be the Chinese champion on this issue? Since it is a historical fact that the BN political parties are race-based parties, it is best that Nazri look into his own backyard. I am sure my Malay brothers and sisters would appreciate to have their welfare being continuously taken care of by a vocal Malay Minister like Nazri Aziz, and not only during elections time. There is more than meets the eye to Nazri’s statement. I have said it before that the statement by MCA President Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek is nothing more than a cheap political gimmick.

Soi Lek loses nothing by making that statement. He knew that his “pornographic” background makes him unsuitable to be a government Minister. Thus, Soi Lek is actually sacrificing the government posts of other MCA leaders who could pose a threat to his MCA Presidency. The Chinese community is not stupid to not see Soi Lek’s objectives. It was only recently that Nazri Aziz was seen interfering with GLCs by instructing them to appoint a favored legal firm in order to cause a withdrawal of the cases that these GLCS have against former MAS Chairman, Tan Sri Tajudin Ramli. The public uproar showed that Nazri had miscalculated the public intelligence and reaction. But more than that, I am told that it showed Nazri’s failure to comprehend basic principles of corporate law. I am also told that Nazri’s directive offends the Rule of Law because a government Minister cannot suborn the board of directors of a GLC which is a public listed company in that manner. I believe that Nazri Aziz should know these things better as he is a lawyer, while I am not. By the same reasoning, Nazri’s statement on Chinese representation in the government offends basic logic on the purpose and objective of elections. A general elections is part of the democratic process to allow the electorates to select the leaders whom they would want to govern over them and the country.

If the Chinese electorates have rejected the Chinese leaders from MCA, who is Nazri to force upon us to accept such leaders as our representatives in government? It is more alarming to note the second part of Nazri’s statement that “The system allows us to appoint senators and we need to have representatives of the non-Malay community.” This confirms the public skepticism that appointments to the Senate have been abused as a backdoor entry into government. This is preposterous. More than that, this statement coming from a senior Minister who is a lawyer, displays sheer arrogance which will be deservedly punished in the coming GE 13. Let us be reminded that the being elected to form the government is part of the democratic process. It erodes the fundamentals of democracy when a government is formed not from elected representatives but by back door appointments from politicians who have failed. A government post is not a trophy for political gratification. I hope that as a person trained in the law, Nazri would recant his statement as it demeans the democracy that we hope to nature as we mature as a nation. Merdeka! Merdeka! Merdeka! P.S. “HUMBLENESS IS GOOD VIRTUE, ARROGANCE SHALL FALL, THE MEEK WILL RULE THE WORLD”. – Robert Phang is a well-known philantrohphist and a former member of the MACC’s public panel

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

Nazri, endorse the below 3 items in full and Robert Phang will have to eat his words : 1) Freedom from Apartheid/Fascism 2) Freedom from Religious-Persecution/Religious-Supremacy. 3) Equality for all ethnicities and faiths in all aspects of policy, Law and Constitution. Are you ready to be the Malay leader that the minorities never had? BN might only win if the 3 items are endorsed, so is your minority representatives are lapdogs to prevent the above 3 items, they might as well be Malay and Muslim to boot. Equality only. And if you were a real Muslim, you’d want to end the sin of Asabiya.

“HUMBLENESS IS GOOD VIRTUE, ARROGANCE SHALL FALL, THE MEEK WILL RULE THE WORLD”. But without equality and self determinism, you might as well drop any pretences. How dishonest Zul is. How useless Malaysia Chronicle is. This confirms that Malaysia’s neurotech use is rampant and it could be that TOO MANY Malaysians are affected. We must end this dishonesty. We must end the APARTHEID of Bumiputra. Malay leaders, are you ready to fight for Malaysia’s place in ASEAN where India and China doutbless are aware of apartheid in a very critical and (potentially) unforgiving view?

You’re finished Zul. Malaysia Chronicle is finished. DAP is finished because it does not speak on ending apartheid as well. 3rd Force parties, ready to step forward? Robert Phang, whatever it is enables you to keep your mind clear, better introduce DAP to it. People like Zul are running circles around the likes of Choon Mei and Guan Eng.

SPAD denies land grab – by Clara Chooi – 6th September 2011

In Uncategorized on January 20, 2012 at 7:41 pm

Cannot guarantee protection for ownership of heritage Chinatown properties. SPAD CEO Mohd Nur Kamal in a letter to The Malaysian Insider today cautioned the public against accepting “misleading views”. — file pic KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 6 — The Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) came out today to deny any “land grab” in its acquisition of Jalan Sultan properties for the MRT project but admitted it could not guarantee that the acquired lots would later be returned to landowners. In a letter to The Malaysian Insider, SPAD chief executive officer Mohd Nur Kamal said while the acquisition process was being worked out in detail, the government “is in no position to make guarantees of the return of these properties”.

But he reasoned that what was most important was that the government had “listened” to feedback from the affected parties and had agreed to a mutually acceptable outcome. “This clearly shows that the government is acting in good faith and will continue to do so in resolving this and any future issues related to the MRT,” he said in the three-page letter. The transport regulator complained that dissenting views expressed over the controversial land acquisition had been based on “inaccurate, incomplete and a lack of understanding” of the facts. SPAD has been under constant fire from angry traders with businesses located in the historic Chinatown area over its plan to acquire their properties to facilitate the tunnelling portion of the multibillion-ringgit rail project. Suspicion has also been raised over whether the transport regulator’s purpose of acquiring the prime land lots was to exploit their commercial value to fund the construction of the MRT, said to be Malaysia’s most expensive infrastructure project to date.

Among others, Jalan Sultan traders are also upset that they were not consulted prior to the final alignment of the MRT’s Sungai Buloh-Kajang line and are now also mulling following Bukit Bintang traders in filing for a judicial review on the proposed acquisition. But Mohd Nur cautioned the public against accepting “misleading views” and urged them to first examine the intentions of those making such allegations, saying it could be designed to confuse and aggravate the situation. He confirmed that the government was exploring Hong Kong’s “rail plus property” scheme to help minimise spending on public transport infrastructure but stressed that this would only be carried out on government-owned land that is “unused, underutilised or not being utilised optimally”. “Indeed, there may be instances where private land may be purchased to enhance the development potential but this will be done on a ‘willing buyer-willing seller’ basis. “Therefore, the accusations that the land that is being compulsorily acquired for the MRT project is tantamount to land grabbing, is baseless,” he said.

For the Jalan Sultan or Chinatown lots, Mohd Nur said that in the interest of time and other factors, the government had decided to select the option of acquiring all the affected properties at the outset before re-releasing them back to their original owners after tunnelling works are completed. He pointed out that this had been worked out following SPAD’s meeting with the landowners and MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek recently. Mohd Nur quoted Dr Chua as saying during a press conference after the meeting that the “government will proceed with the acquisition but with the condition that it would strengthen the buildings affected by the construction of the MRT tunnel, for the safety of the buildings’ occupants …

But after the tunnel is completed in about six months, they will be allowed to move back in to conduct business as usual.” SPAD chairman Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar, he added, had also stated that all the parties involved understood that there were many details yet to be worked out in order for this to be achieved such as compensation, timeline and the rights of current tenants occupying the properties.

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

Two terms for the Rakyat. ALLODIAL and EMINENT-DOMAIN. If enough people vote specifically for MPs and Assemblymen who will adopt the above 2 as laws (that Bar Council is shamefully not even addressing or promoting, I once discussed this with a titled lawyer of some prominence, and he shied away from the issue entirely . . . so if lawyers would have non-lawyers do the Bar Council’s job to protect the people, we don’t need lawyers anymore now do we? They act as mere toll keepers for documents that the government will not release until the ‘toll fee commission’ is paid first), all properties that are freehold will NEVER be subjected to nonsense acquisitions like this.

Just drop BOTH coalitions and run as a private candidate if your MP and Assemblyman are not going to implement the above 2 terms into law. Also when in doubt, vote only for Joe Publics who are worth no more than 200K, also see the pledge/questionairre below and ask your MP candidate or Assemblyman candidate, current MP or Assemblyman to sign with a cam taking down the signing in the presence of as many media reporters or people as possible :

Rakyat, 2 more terms to learn and judge your MPs by. Think before you vote. Logos before ethos (i.e. substance before form, or thereabouts). Also study the below link which the entire legal profession needs to study (some portions are floridly expressed but the section on property rights is particularly relevant to the Chinatown issue) :

Self-Sovereign Individual Project Text http://selfsip.org/
Nail house http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nail_house

Divide And Conquer : Through Hegelian Dialectics – by @Elijah – 12th August 2010

In Uncategorized on January 20, 2012 at 7:38 pm

How The Illuminati Elites Keep You(the masses) Divided, Distracted and Diverted Through Their Divide And Conquer Method Of Hegelian Dialectics. New York City Mosque Protests. Arizona Immigration Protest. It is through this divide and conquer strategy that the Powers that be continue to rule over the masses and formulate the arguments that people fight about on a daily basis. From Arizona, to New York, the Hegelian method has been and is in costant use by those that set the agenda for the rest of us. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnYoocSfrzE&feature=related

Dialogue to Consensus (take caution on anyone using this word ‘Consensus’) : The most successful method to manipulate and control society is the Hegelian Dialectic, named after its originator Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831). It has been used by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels to support their theory of communism. The dialectic process as described by Hegel can be reduced to three parts: a recursive pattern of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. The thesis (each idea) is opposed by its antithesis and reconciled with the thesis in a synthesis (consensus), which in turn becomes a new thesis opposed by antithesis. Hegel said that history was nothing but the expression of this flux of conflicting and resolving ideas. Since every synthesis is the thesis of a new dialectic, social change is guaranteed. The process continues until society reaches the Absolute Idea: the ultimate synthesis, giving rise to no antithesis.

In the context of this document, the “Absolute Idea” is world government. The dialectic process is at the core of all political and social manipulation.

1 Fascism against communism; capitalism against communism; democrats against republicans; conservatives against liberals; Christians against Muslims; environmentalists versus property owners; greens against libertarians; pro-choice pitted against pro-life; antiwar activists versus the neocons. The control of the conflict and resolution leads everyone into a new cycle of conflicts.

2 The right-left political dichotomy of western politics is carefully orchestrated: a classic divide and conquer Hegelian trap. Whichever side of any particular ideology we happen to adhere, our beliefs and convictions fulfills a necessary role in the grand scheme. A perpetual recursion of constant change, becoming, ceasing, contradictory aspects of tension/conflict and eventual transformation. The beneficiaries of the “resolution of conflict” are properly identified as the Illuminati. In order to have complete control over the conflict of opposites it is necessary to control the creation of textbook enemies as well. That Hitler’s Third Reich (the communist revolution, the creation of Israel, Saddam Hussein, Noriega, Bin Laden and much too many to list) were financed, supported and nurtured by Wall Street bankers, and/or the CIA and/or members of western secret societies is not coincidence

3. With the Soviet Union having run its course (capitalism vs. communism) through successful “synthesis” with the west, a new “antithesis” was already mature enough to take its place: Islamic Fundamentalism. Hegemony: The control of the dialogue and ideas leads inevitably to hegemony; defined, succinctly, as the power of ideas exercised by a dominant or privileged social group over subordinate social groups. Hegemony is the aftermath of the Hegelian Dialectic, the outcome of the “ends justify the means” maxim. The people have not submitted to this power, “they consent to it – though it is clearly not in their own best interest. Hegemony is a form of control in which those who have power maintain their position, not through force, but through the elaboration of a particular ideology or world view. This form of social control is long lasting, it is an effective, and patient, tactic.”

4 Hegemony is, of course, the ultimate goal of all past and current political leadership in America. Imposing American Hegemony in the Middle East is of particular urgent concern to the powerful Illuminati powers that be. Humanism and the “Arena of Conflict” “The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation” “We must begin by destroying all Religion, all civil society, and finish by the destruction of all [private] property.” – Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, 1776 “We must war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of country, of patriotism. The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed.” – Karl Marx, 1848

Humanism is the guiding principle behind today’s “open conspiracy” as it is seductively appealing to the pride/ego of man. Weishaupt himself advocated the replacing of all religions and nations with a form of humanism by establishing “a peculiar morality and religion fitted for the great society of mankind.” Socialism and Communism are based upon humanist principles – and indeed are the fruits of the philosophy; we saw how badly it failed in the former Soviet Union and how it continues to subjugate over a billion people in China. Remember the creed and over ruling doctrine of the Illuminati: Novus Ordem Seclorum-New Secular World Order.

Humanism in all its manifestations (secular, religious, ethical, cultural, philosophical, etc.) seeks to idolize man and the natural world in place of God. Modern manifestations of it range from the United Nations to Satanism

7. It is the very backbone of the New Age Movement, Freemasonry and indeed the Illuminati itself. The dangerous maxim “do what thou wilt shall be whole of the law” then applies to every aspect of morality and society. 8 The Humanist has no moral absolutes. In the words of the official Humanist Manifesto II, “moral values derive their source from human experience. Ethics is autonomous and situational needing no theological or ideological sanction.” Humanism is another powerful tool by which the Hegelian process works on society. Experimental Laboratories: The late Antony C. Sutton established that the American education system has been influenced and controlled by Skull and Bones members since the 19th century. After being initiated into the Order – between 1849 and 1853 – Timothy Dwight, Daniel Coit Gilman, Andrew Dickson White set off for Europe to study philosophy at the University of Berlin when Germany was dominated by the Hegelian philosophical ferment. It was during these formative years that the Bonesmen were exposed to the revolutionary philosophies of Right Hegelians (Prussian militarism; Naziism) and Left Hegelians (promoters of scientific socialism; Marxism). All three went on to use these philosophies adeptly and rose to high influence within the education establishment. More Bonesmen were to follow and it has become a tradition for the Order to have control over influential scholastic institutions.

9 If the Hegelian Dialectic is the modus operandi of elite control and the drive toward a New World Order, then Humanism is the magnum opus, or masterstroke. The moral degeneration of the youth is a direct result of a socialistic/humanistic experiment. The facilitators of the plan understood from the beginning that to change society an educational revolution will need to take place. H. J. Blackham, father of modern British Humanism, said that humanists “are more revolutionary than any conspiracy to overthrow the government.” (September – October 1981 issue of The Humanist) “Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American school is a school of humanism. What can a theistic Sunday school’s meeting for an hour once a week and teaching only a fraction of the children do to stem the tide of the five-day program of humanistic teaching?” – Charles F. Potter, Humanism: A New Religion, 1930 “I am convinced that the battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly view their role as the proselytizers of a new faith… The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and the new; the rotting corpse of Christianity, together with all its adjacent evils and misery, and the new faith of Humanism…”- John J. Dunphy, A New Religion For A New Age, in The Humanist, January/February 1983 edition “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas….We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests….The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of old people, these are the belated objectives…for charting the changes in human behavior.”- Brock Chislholm, 1959 Humanist of the Year and former head of World Health Organization, in the February 1946 issue of Psychiatry. After reading the above quotes it becomes crystal clear that, not just a conspiracy, but an all out battle has been waged on the mind of the child for nearly a century – and all at the expense of the taxpayer. An indoctrination of a “new faith” begins from the moment we enter the first grade, and continues unimpeded throughout our formal education. The public school system – or the “arena of conflict” – succeeds in an escalating resocialization of society itself; the goal being a world government with its citizens having been brainwashed out of their patriotism, family traditions, religious values and teachings. Humanists do not mince words and are brutally honest: “some opponents of Humanism have accused us of wishing to overthrow the traditional Christian family. They are right. That is exactly what we intend to do.”

10 State Facilitators: In 1986, a group of Pennsylvania researchers found a how-to manual entitled Training for Change Agents: a seven volume “change agent study” commissioned by the U.S. Office of Education to the Rand Corporation in 1973-74. They also uncovered a series of papers submitted by behavioral scientists who had obtained grants from the U.S. Office of Education. The studies explored ways to “freeze” and “unfreeze” values, to “implement change” and turn potential opposition into compliant, rubber-stamp bodies through methods such as the Delphi Technique. The official documents solicited by the U.S. government revealed the objective to pursue sophisticated behavioral and psychological manipulation.

11 The Pennsylvania researchers followed up and uncovered more documents relating to “behavioral strategies.” Schools were referred to as “experimental laboratories.” Linked with the word education they found terms and concepts such as “laboratory,” “behavior,” “operant conditioning,” “social reinforcement,” “internal-external control,” “training change agents,” “the science of planned change,” and how to train “change agents” for the “role of the state facilitator.” Even before the Training for Change Agents how-to manual of 1973/74, in 1967 the U.S. Office of Education were already awarding “grants to colleges and universities for the training of change agents.” A 1000 page document called Behavioral Teacher Educational Project set forth the agenda in clear language: “the impersonal manipulation through schooling of a future America in which few will be able to maintain control over their own opinions.” An America in which “each individual receives at birth, a multipurpose identification number”, and “to expose them to the directors subliminal influence of the state education department and the federal department acting through those whenever necessary.” 12 When the humanists refer to the schools as the “arena of conflict”, they mean it literally. A child today may enter public education with a set of values instilled in them by their parents, but as they progress through the state-sponsored “laboratories”, those values and attitudes are methodically dissected and superseded with a carefully engineered replacement. Paradigm Shift: “A transpersonal orientation to learning was detected in the writings of 89 well-known representatives of humanistic education….According to the Transpersonal Orientation, schools and other settings for learning are environments for the development of spiritual potential. Intuitive and receptive modes of consciousness are considered equal in importance to cognitive, rational, logical, and active modes…Since various practices in the public schools ranging from the so-called religions of secular humanism on the one hand and to meditation, the use of fantasy and imagery, and references to magic, the occult, or witchcraft, on the other have become so controversial of late that an objective, reliable, and valid measure of the degree of endorsement of such topics was considered both practically and theoretically timely” – Stewart Shapiro, The Development of an Objective Scale to Measure a Transpersonal Orientation to Learning, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 49, 1989, 47, 375 Visit any school in America or the West in general and you will find teaching concepts like outcome-based education; holistic education; transpersonal education; conflict resolution; integrated curriculum; constructivist learning; general systems theory; personal mastery; mental models; child centered classroom; total quality management; school to work; consensus circles; peer mediation; focus groups; values clarification; situational ethics; sensitivity training. Since Humanism is intertwined so completely at the core of Communism, it is no surprise that this humanistic “groupthink education” serves the purpose of paralyzing individual thinking. The Group, the State and eventually a One World Government must be superior to the individual at all costs – group-subservience and group-consensus is vital. After the Humanists became entrenched in the field of education, the 80s and 90s saw a cultural shift take place. With God successfully rooted out of the secular school system, many times the void was filled with the teaching of yoga, self-hypnosis, meditation, and the altered states of consciousness induction techniques of deep breathing and progressive relaxation. Detailing how the New Age had begun to affect public education, The New York Times Magazine published an article in its May 1st 1988 edition titled Colorado’s Thriving Cults. Under a large picture of children taking a nap, the cover story photograph had the caption: “Third graders listen quietly while a teacher leads a ‘visualization.’ Vocal parents groups have protested the encroachment of New Age practices in school curricula.” The story goes on to say that “meditational techniques have become common fare in the state’s public and private schools”, utilizing “practices adapted from Eastern meditation under the rubrics of ‘centering, stress reduction, or guided visualization’ …”

13 The New World Order and the Parliament of Man: For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see, Saw the Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be; Saw the heavens fill with commerce, argosies of magic sails, Pilots of the purple twilight, dropping down with costly bales; Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there rain’d a ghastly dew From the nations’ airy navies grappling in the central blue; Far along the world-wide whisper of the south-wind rushing warm, With the standards of the peoples plunging thro’ the thunder-storm; Till the war-drums throbb’d, no longer, and the battle-flags were furl’d
In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world. There the common sense of most shall hold a fretful realm in awe, And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law. – ALFRED, LORD TENNYSON, “Locksley Hall,” verses 60–65, The Poetical Works of Alfred, Lord Tennyson, p. 111 (1897).

For those just starting to research the “new world order”, they may be shocked to learn that it’s really about world government. Even the consummate researcher, Joan Veon lamented as much in her book The United Nations’ Global Straightjacket: “I had no idea that it was world government … no one ever made the connection for me.” She certainly made up for the oversight, however. Veon goes on to thoroughly document the players involved, the methods, the organizations and especially the behemoth infrastructure that exists already. Presently, we live in an “unofficial world government.” The world will have to go through some catastrophic event, much larger in scale than 9/11, to catapult us into an “official world government.” Whether it is orchestrated like 9/11, or not, is largely irrelevant to these “masters of Hegemony.” It will come one way or another and the infrastructure is well in place for the Illuminati to take advantage of it. Reinvented Government: The story of how we reached this point along the path to global totalitarianism is a long one, many books have been written on the subject and I won’t go into the details here. A short overview of the present will suffice. With the creation of the United Nations, free-trade zones, public-private partnerships, communitarianism, some 30,000+ NGOs and 37,000+ Multinational Corporations and Foundations we now see a devolution of the government. Globalization has effectively achieved a global corporate fascism.

To better illustrate the scope of it all, I’ve reproduced a compilation of Chart 2-1 and Chart 2-5 from The United Nations’ Global Straightjacket: Reinvented Government = Communitarianism = The Third Way = Reinvented Communitarianism “In time, those industrialists who empowered the NGOs will ‘rule the world’ through ‘reinvented government.’” – Joan Veon, The United Nations’ Global Straightjacket p.87 International leaders are financed through the Multinational/Foundation behemoth, with the specific purpose to give the U.N. its teeth by creating global special-interest groups known as NGOs. Congress may not sign certain treaties and international agreements, but it makes no difference because the NGOs have the power to implement any agenda covertly at the local level.

“Think globally, act locally” is their battle cry, and thus far, it has worked like a charm. Agenda 21 and the Earth Charter – invented and espoused by the likes of Maurice Strong, Stephen Rockefeller and Mikhail Gorbachev – has never been agreed upon, endorsed or signed by Congress; yet you can see endorsements and full implementations across a wide slice of society: from schools, churches, the workplace and local municipalities. 14 The following is a short list, by no means exhaustive, of the major players helping in the goal toward a one-world government: think-tanks, foundations, change agent NGOs, new age organizations and official UN bodies. You may be surprised by some of the organizations with NGO attached to their names. NGO’s have been around since the UN’s inception, some have been granted special Consultative Status (ECOSOC) which allows them to sit in on weekly sessions and be a part of the decision making along with full member states.

Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies Association of Humanistic Psychology (NGO) Bahá’í International Community (NGO) Bank For International Settlements Brookings Institute Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (NGO) Carter Center Club Of Madrid (NGO) Club Of Rome (NGO) Commission on Global Governance (NGO) Council For the Parliament of World Religions Council On Foreign Relations (NGO) Ditchley Foundations Earth Charter Initiative Earth Council (NGO) Esalen Institute Federal Reserve Findhorn Foundation (NGO) Ford Foundation Global Public Policy Gorbachev Foundation Green Cross International (NGO) Group-77 Group of 30 (NGO) Habitat For Humanity Heritage Foundation Hudson Institute Institute For International Economics Institute For Policy Studies Institute For Social Research Institute of Global Education (NGO) International Monetary Fund International Planned Parenthood (NGO) LEAD International (NGO) Lucis Trust (NGO) Manitou Foundation (NGO) Mont Pelerin Society MOST – Management of Social Transformations (A UNESCO Project) New Group of World Servers NGO’s (Non Governmental Organizations associated with the UN) NGO Committee on Disarmament NGO’s in Consultative Status with ECOSOC Planned Parenthood Federation of America (NGO) Population Council (NGO) Population Institute (NGO) Rand Corp. Rockefeller Foundation (NGO) Rothschild, NM & Sons Royal Institute of International Affairs Share International (NGO) Sierra Club (NGO) Stanford Research Institute State of the World Forum Tavistock Institute Temple of Understanding (NGO) Theosophical Society Trilateral Commission (NGO) United Nations United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development UNDP UNESCO World Bank Group World Business Council for Sustainable Development (NGO) World Conservation Union (NGO) World Goodwill (NGO) World Federalist Movement (NGO) World Wildlife Fund (NGO) A Universalist Promulgation

The Illuminati’s “Absolute Idea” of the Hegelian Dialectic is for the ultimate synthesis to encompass a One-World Government, a One-World economic system, and a One-World Religion. The economic and political infrastructure is far enough ahead with the only missing piece being the creation of this “New World Religion.” Many attempts have surfaced in the 20th century, but besides interfaith agreements and cooperation, no definitive framework is complex and thorough enough to claim that potential prize. “He excelled not only in theology but in other branches of knowledge, such as the humanities, the philosophy of the Illuminati, the teachings of the mystics and of the Shaykhí School. He was a universal man, in himself alone a convincing proof.” – Memorials of the Faithful: Nabíl-i-Akbar To develop a genuine world order there needs to be: A World Government: to enact the laws required to satisfy the needs of all peoples.

It will have at its disposal the combined forces of the world in order to maintain peace. A World Parliament: The members of this should be elected by the people in each country, and their election should be confirmed by their respective governments. A World Code Of Law: based on justice for individuals and for nations. A World Tribunal: Its decision will be binding on all parties. World Police Force: An international police force must be created, dedicated to upholding justice with complete impartiality. Universal Equality: Everyone must have the right to education and to be equal before the law. There must be a universal bill of human rights A World Language: A world language will be either chosen or invented. This will be taught in all the schools of each country, in addition to the mother tongue of the region. A world currency is necessary to stabilise the world economy. A universal system of weights and measures is required to improve trade and communications. A world economic community needs to be created where all economic barriers will be removed, and a world free trade area established. Posted by Elijah at 3:35 PM

http://prophecyinthemaking.blogspot.com/2010/08/divide-and-conquerthrough- hegelian.html

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

Just like the other greats did, we’ll make our own system as we go along. Plenty of inspiration coming from those failures calling themselves economists, experts, politicians and mentors or what not. Even Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, F. A. Hayek, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Ayn Rand, etc. had flaws in their systems. So who adopts a system wholesale? Portions of communism are perfect, some are failures. Lew Rockwell has portions that a failure as well so no go. But we should always adopt the best and learn what Hagelian Dialectic means : Don’t bother recruiting people into flawed mindsets, any proponents of whatever cult of personality, this generation is one of diversity and freedom. Nothing will be taken wholesale, all abuses or laws will be dropped. Government 3.0is the future, is OPEN SOURCING from all systems.

1.0 being Absolute Monarchy or Junta backed by military

2.0 being Capitalism/Communism dichotomy

3.0 Open Source No more cults of personality (any single government philosophy), limitless terms (monarchy in bureaucracy), much less Theocracy and Fundamentalism (Monotheism is the worst thing since Polytheism which was at least conversable between Idols, though persons will always be subject and not sovereign . . . )

4.0 Singularity / Apotheosis of Man (Guided by conscience, awareness and consent – the education system needs to be overhauled first, it is a mere brainwash machine as of now.)

Demerit system mulled by Josephine Jalleh and Tan Sin Chow – 16th September 2011 (north@thestar.com.my)

In Uncategorized on January 20, 2012 at 10:49 am

THE Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) is working on a set of conditions that beach operators would have to comply with before the ban on water sports activities in Batu Ferringhi can be lifted. State Local Government and Traffic Management Committee chairman Chow Kon Yeow said one of the conditions was the implementation of a demerit system whereby operators who violate the rules and regulations would have their license revoked and their equipment confiscated. This move was among the proposals raised at meetings that the MPPP held separately with the operators, hoteliers and the police, with the aim of creating tighter regulations for water scooter and parasailing activities at the beach.

Since Sept 6, all water scooter and parasailing activities in Penang were temporarily banned with immediate effect following a recent spate of accidents where a number of tourists were injured along the Batu Ferringhi-Tanjung Bungah tourism belt.

Remedial action: Chow and MPPP reaction, tourism and international affairs director Mohamed Akbar Mustapha showing the signs that will be displayed for public awareness at the benches in Batu Ferringhi.

In January, the council had also imposed a permanent ban on commercial horse-riding and quad bikes along the beach. Chow told a press conference in Komtar yesterday that one of the proposals was for an enquiry body to be set up to investigate accident cases and violation of regulations.

“Another suggestion is to give operator companies identification numbers and require beach boys to wear uniform with serial numbers,” he said. Chow added that suggestions included setting up buoys to identify zones for swimming and for water sports, and signboards displaying instructions and prohibitions in various languages to make tourists aware of the risks involved. There were also suggestions that the MPPP assist the operators in setting up the Association of Watersports Operators, and that a patrol team would be on duty at the popular spots on the beach. “We will hold more meetings with the quarters involved to look into the finer details of all the suggestions and conditions,” he said, adding that there were 30 operators with 80 water scooters in Batu Ferringhi.

The latest incident which sparked the ban was on Aug 20 when five tourists from Malaysia, Singapore, Britain and Australia claimed they were attacked by about 10 beach boys in Tanjung Bungah over a water scooter accident. On Sept 6, police picked up four beach boys aged between 18 and 30 in connection with the brawl. When contacted, George Town OCPD Asst Comm Gan Kong Meng said police were still waiting to record statements from the tourists. “Their statements are vital. We need information from them to help us wrap up investigations,” he said. ACP Gan added that the suspects were now out on police bail pending investigations. It was earlier reported that the case was being investigated under Section 323 of the Penal Code for voluntarily causing hurt. Police have since reclassified it as rioting under Section 147.

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

Rubbish and arrogance by DAP’s TERM LIMITLESS Chow Kon Yeow and gas tank stealing, 750 funeral law cohorts. It is the voters who will mull which MP to remove that dares that intends to impose such INSULTING demerit laws – does DAP think this is school? The voters will put DAP in detention and remedial instead. The voters will permanently give demerits to fallen politicians who presume to ‘mull’ anything as if they ‘controlled’ society.

They will vote these abusive ‘mulling’ CITIZENS posing as politicians out of power, who dare presume IMPOSING a demerit point system. Tour operators, Horse ride operators, Beach Boys and Buah Pala residents, Gambier Threat affected citizens, Muslim Traders, KOMTAR Traders etc.. – Penang need only rally 13 MPs, to run for candidacy for Penang to become independent, and ALL so-called demerit systems (even taxes, rent assessments etc.. in entirety) could be REMOVED permanently.

How dare DAP presume to mull anything? DAP will be removed along with all APARTHEID racists and bad law (Vehicular AP, Toll Concession, Forced Military Conscription, GAT/VAT Proposers ) promulgators. You had your 15 mins Mr. 6 term (unlimited term) Chow, pack up and leave Penang to the real citizens who are not PAP style oppresso-Zion-stooges. Mull this – EITHER amend those laws, and stop presuming to ‘mull’, or be voted out of power. Put uneducated morons in a suit (rote learning degree educated types) and they begin to think they are really in charge . . . Meanwhile the 3 items again :

1) Freedom from Apartheid/Fascism
2) Freedom from Religious-Persecution/Religious-Supremacy.
3) Equality for all ethnicities and faiths in all aspects of policy, Law and Constitution.

Vote 3rd Force!