marahfreedom

Mother-of-four, 28, banned from every nightclub in town for being ‘too old to wear skimpy outfits’ – By Nick Enoch Last updated at 1:09 PM on 23rd January 2012

In Uncategorized on January 24, 2012 at 8:49 am

Lisa Woodman has life ban from Mode, Tramps and Velvet (unless she dresses more appropriately) Lisa’s sister: ‘It’s always the same response – “You ain’t getting in tonight, girls”

With a size six figure and 36DD chest, this petite blonde thought she would have no trouble getting into a nightclub.

But 28-year-old Lisa Woodman has been banned from every hotspot in her home town – after being told she is too old to wear skimpy outfits.

The furious mother-of-four was barred from three venues in Worcester, West Midlands, because of her low-cut tops, short skirts and knee-length boots.

Ms Woodman, who is 5ft 3in, admitted she liked to flaunt her figure but claimed her outfits were conservative compared with those of younger girls.

She was left in tears on New Year’s Eve when doormen at Mode turned her away and told her: ‘You’re too old to wear that get-up.’

Ms Woodman has also been banned from the city’s other two nightclubs – Tramps and Velvet.

All three, owned by the same company in Worcester, said the ban will stay unless she tones down her appearance.

The mother-of-four, a medical secretary at a hospital hygiene company, said: ‘What’s wrong with what I wear?

‘I’m not hurting anyone, am I? I am covering everything, and I just want to have a good time.
Ms Woodman, who is 5ft 3in, admitted she liked to flaunt her figure but claimed her outfits were conservative compared with those of younger girls

Ms Woodman, who is 5ft 3in, admitted she liked to flaunt her figure but claimed her outfits were conservative compared with those of younger girls

‘We never cause any trouble and we’ve never been rude to the bouncers.

‘None of the pubs give me any hassle about my outfits so why do the nightclubs have such a problem?’

She added: ‘There were teenagers and girls in their 20s wearing much more revealing outfits but they went straight in.

‘When I asked the bouncers why me and my sister weren’t allowed in, they just said “You’re too old to wear that get-up”. I couldn’t believe it. I’m only 28 and still consider myself young.’

Lisa started hitting the town last year after splitting from her long-term partner and father of her children Josh, 12, Jamie, ten, and daughters Billie, six, and three-year-old Angel.

She had a breast enhancement operation in April and regularly works out in the gym to keep her figure.

‘I always like to look sexy when I go out on the town,’ she said.

‘I split up from my partner last year and I was really upset so I had a boob job in April and got into shape going to the gym and now I just want to flaunt what I’ve got.

‘I normally wear short skirts and one-piece outfits which might be revealing but never show off too much.

‘I like my high-heel boots and mini-skirts. I’ve got loads of them – they usually cost between £20 and £50 but when I let my hair down, I like to look my best.’

Lisa enjoys a night on the town in Worcester once a fortnight with her sister Sarah, 32.

They usually try to end the evening at Mode, Tramps, or Velvet.

But Lisa claims some of the doormen have humiliated her when turning her away.

She said: ‘One doorman even made me walk up and down and turn around in front of people laughing at what I was wearing.

‘I was totally in shock and really humiliated. I look after myself and I’m only 28. I just want to be treated with a bit of respect.

Mode (above), along with Velvet and Tramps – Worcester’s three nightclubs – have all given Lisa Woodman a life ban unless she ‘makes an effort’ with her choice of clothing

Dean Hill, director of Nexum Leisure, which runs the clubs (including Tramps, above), said: ‘We expect people to make an effort and we have a dress code of smart casual’
Lisa started hitting the town last year after splitting from her long-term partner and father of her children Josh, 12, Jamie, ten, and daughters Billie, six, and three-year-old Angel. Pictured above, Velvet nightclub

‘I rang the nightclub to complain but they just don’t listen.

‘The door staff told me I was banned for life unless I dress differently. It’s outrageous.’

Her sister Sarah, a mother-of-one, said: ‘If we were rude to the bouncers, they really would never let us in, so we’re always polite and say “Hi, how are you?”

‘But it’s always the same response – “You ain’t getting in tonight, girls”.’

Yesterday, nightclub bosses defended their ban, saying they had a ‘responsible door policy’.

Dean Hill, director of Nexum Leisure, which runs the clubs, said: ‘We expect people to make an effort and we have a dress code of smart casual.

‘It is the venue managers who are on the doors – they make decisions on the doors based on our policies.

‘They make judgements based on someone’s behaviour, their dress, if they’re abusive and whether they have ID.

‘And that is to make sure all our customers have a good night.

‘At the end of the day, it’s private premises and we reserve the right to refuse entry for anyone.’

[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]

It’s good to have separation of pub types to better specialise the attending demographic but maybe they should have who is allowed to enter or not made very clear so that this sort of embarrassing exchange does not occur. This woman should open her own pub and invite all those mothers with kids who were recently divored that are 28 years and above to visit (I’m sure Lisa herself would also limit the maximum age at some point so make it clear . . . ). This is obviously a :

(1) ageism (quasi-pedo feel if so – no persons 23 years or older allowed) or
(2) divorced maritial status or
(3) parental status discrimination (you have kids, so not allowed to socialise . . . )

;case that could get Lisa a bit of compensation to start your own pub with. To think England was supposed to be inclusive or what not. It’s no better than some parts of the 3rd world in England after all! Talk about narrow communalism when they are pushing intergenderism or mixed toilets in schools, double standards have never been so glaring! More pantless days (how about every Sunday?) ! More topless and bottomless pubs! More strip poker outlets.

So whats the big deal about a 28 year old divorcee with kids who’s obviously not too frightful looking entering a pub? Pubs are supposed to be PUBLIC where every and anyone can enter – put up those :

(1) Age Limit (tween only, teen only, below 21 only, above 21 only, below 23 or 35 only . . . whatever baloney)
(2) Martial Status (no married people allowed, only married people – swingers – allowed)
(3) Parent basis
(4) No LGBTs
(5) No non-Caucasians / No Caucasians
(6) No dogs, cats or pets
(7) No uncool cars (i.e. must be modified or sports etc.. – ‘car dress code’)

. . . no entry for such persons/objects signs up y’hear – wheres the PC police when you need them . . .

Though all inclusive 100% real pubs, should be givenall sorts of incentives etc. to celebrate their PC-ness. The more groups allowed in, the more benefits or leeway from government, its a nod or frown paradigm not a road block and armed thugs concept. Civil society.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: