Things you didn’t suspect – THE CORRIDORS OF POWER – Monday, 19 March 2012 admin-s
There are many unsavory things happening inside PKR that are seldom heard outside the circle of intimates and the next few paragraphs shall attempt to address these issues.
One. PKR is divided into two factions; one that is only reserved for the Malays and the other the non-Malays. Each will hold their “unofficial” council meetings separately before voting en bloc during the official supreme council meetings. The majority of the time the Malay faction wins, as DSAI is the only one holding veto powers but not all the time as this is done to retain some semblance of democracy within the party.
Two. Who did you guys think set Eli Wong up? BN? Think again. Those photos did not materialise from nowhere and that somewhere points to Gombak and Ampang. Don’t believe this? Well, if you have a close friend high up in the DAP, PAS or PKR hierarchy, ask them and they will confirm the truth about it. Why the Hell do you people think Eli wanted to quit politics? It is definitely not because of what everybody thought happened (that BN set her up) but because everybody (who is anybody) knew where the setup originated from. If BN wanted to set her up, Eli would have been be set up right.
Three. No one denies what Azmin Ali wants and that includes DSAI and Wan Azizah. When Azmin was discovered to have set up Zaid Ibrahim with a photo-shopped picture during the last PKR Party Elections, he got off scot-free. No inquiry and no nothing. Likewise, when Azmin’s name was implicated in the illegal sand mining activities in Selangor, no investigations were initiated, merely a statement stating that the “Azmin” in the taped conversation is not the Azmin Ali but some other Azmin who incidentally wields the same political power as this Azmin Ali. Once again no inquiry and no nothing.
Four. Azmin Ali and Zuraida Kamaruddin are a team and that means that no one can touch Zuraida as well as she is “protected” by Azmin Ali. When the RM18,000 collections went unaccounted for in the Pasar Larut Malam @Jelatek incident, the MPAJ did not dare ask for it even though this amount rightfully belongs to them. When illegal structures were permanently erected around Spectrum Shopping Mall in Ampang as part of “Ampang Walk”, once again MPAJ did not dare dismantle them even when these structures did not possess the necessary municipal permits during the construction stage (or even now). Hell, the YDP of MPAJ doesn’t even dare mention it during the council meetings.
Five. Zuraida used former MPAJ councilor Tan Hua Meng (Ketua Zon Lapan) as her proxy to do her dirty work. It was only when the residents of Ampang forced their way to confront DSAI during one of his ceramahs in Kampung Pandan to express their displeasure and to handover a protest note that Tan Hua Meng was dismissed from being a MPAJ councilor. However, what Zuraida wants, Zuraida gets and Tan Hua Meng was reinstated as a MPAJ councilor less than a year later. Tan Hua Meng is now replaced by Fong Teck Keong (current Ketua Zon Lapan) the building contractor nominated by Tan Hua Meng and Zuraida to erect the illegal Ampang Walk. Coincidence? I think not. Well, at least Tan Hua Meng got his get-out-of-jail card and was able to walk away. Not so lucky for Zakaria Rahim, Zuraida’s former proxy before Tan Hua Meng. Got caught manipulating the books for a mere RM5,000.
Six. The PKR party election scam. Two members register rolls. Zero appeal in the event of a tie (party makes the decision then). Photo-shopped picture of Zaid holding an alcoholic drink. No inquiry performed later when allegations of corruption arose. Anyone backing any candidates against Azmin’s and Zuraida’s chosen ones to be ostracized. Hell, who chose DSAI to lead PKR anyway? Self elected?
Seven. When the proposal for a shadow cabinet was mulled over by Pakatan Rakyat, PKR immediately shot it down. Zaid was the sole individual from PKR supporting it and perhaps here lies the foundation for the breakup between Zaid and DSAI. Why go against the formation of a shadow cabinet? One must first consider who from PKR will be selected. Azmin? Zuraida? And what shadow ministries will they occupy? Azmin wanted to be one of the DPMs but that is not possible, as Tok Guru (PAS) and Karpal Singh or Lim Kit Siang (DAP) will occupy these positions. Zuraida wants Wanita and DAP wants it as well and since DSAI will become the shadow PM, both Azmin and Zuraida may end up shadowing minor ministries (quid pro quo), something they do not want happening. Zaid could possibly end up in a higher position than Azmin and the latter isn’t amused. Remember, what Azmin wants, Azmin gets.
Eight. The criteria for selection as a candidate for both state and parliamentary seats are loyalty (not to the party but strictly to either DSAI and/or Azmin). Qualifications do not matter. Corruption-free is not mandatory. Popularity is not a prerequisite. Potential frogs formally from Umno are welcomed. Any existing Member of Parliament and Member of State Assemblies who do not answer “how high” when asked to jump by DSAI or Azmin are to be dropped in the next GE, no matter what the winning majority was in the previous election (except a few untouchables). To be assured as a parliamentary candidate, one must be nationally accepted (Tian Chua, Michael Jeyakumar, Khalid Ibrahim), a son of a very close family friend to DSAI (Loh Gwo Burne), a family member of the self elected so called Ketua Umum PKR (Nurul Izzah Anwar, Wan Azizah) or belonging to DSAI’s inner sanctum (Azmin Ali, Zuraida Kamaruddin, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, Johari Abdul). Do not be surprised that Rafizi Ramli, Dato’ Dr. Mansor Othman, Shamsul Iskandar, Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, Khalid Jaafar, Abd Rahman Yusof, Haniza Talha, Fariz Musa, Zakaria Hamid and Ismail Yusop all get to contest parliamentary seats (notice anything weird in that list?) in the next GE.
Nine. The Azmin Ali long-term plan is to usurp the leadership of PKR and to turn it into another quasi-Umno with the sprinkling of Chinese and Indian representation for show. Zuraida’s long-term plan is to take over as the Timbalan, and along the way collect sufficient funds via proxies to have an “enriched” retirement. What she does not suspect is that Rafizi is also having the same thoughts.
Ten. RPK will never come home to Malaysia regardless of who wins the next GE, both DSAI and Azmin will see to that (should Pakatan reach Putrajaya).
Conclusion: The state of affairs in PKR is like shit. Sorry, it is worse than shit because manure can’t hold a candle to it. If one were to be stuck in it and desires to get out, one would have to look way up to the level of shit and hope one is in it instead of being in the lower-than-dung level one is presently in.
written by syd, March 19, 2012 22:31:14
The state of PKR is what malaysia will be like if anwar becomes PM.
Azmin has been anwar’s bum boy all along. But nobody knew that he could be sodomising Zuraidah as well.
All is not right in PKR if there is a division between the malays and the nons. We voted for a multiracial entity the last time. If its turning into a south african type divide, we may as well stay home.
I call for parties in sabah and sarawak to field some candidates in the peninsular. the pens(peninsular Malaysian party) are so screwed up and only the east malaysians can save us now.
written by Hakim Joe, March 19, 2012 17:23:53
Aiyah, why you guys so thick? What Parlimen Selangor is trying to say is that all the trouble in PKR comes from DSAI, Azmin & Zuraida. Give the mandate to PKR/Pakatan in the next GE but don’t vote these three troublemakers in. That is how you can get rid of them permanently cos after 5 years in the wilderness, and after someone else takes over (could be Nurul if she gets enuf of support), their eventual comeback will be useless. So simple also cannot get it ah?
written by durianbesar, March 19, 2012 16:40:01
vote wisely an attempt by BN to cause confusion I will still vote PR we need to weed out the bad out
written by malchindian, March 19, 2012 16:06:15
Been mulling over this and I’d reckon this article carries the flavour of a surat layang2 don’t you think?
I think this was written by a faction of PR (maybe PKR/DAP/PAS or all three who want the rakyat to know how powerless they are against the tide of AI and AA and their cohorts. Remember, UMNO has always worked the intimidation angle and it still manifests within PKR.
AI and his cohorts have stayed silent all this time because they are silently bidding their time, waiting for the opportunity, letting others do all the work and then reaping the rewards.
And suck it up, Anwaristas! More coming your way!
written by ibabonma, March 19, 2012 16:00:12
At MPAJ they are so desperate to plant their cronies, stooping to the all low level of appointing ex-taxi driver to be the local law maker.
written by SamYap, March 19, 2012 15:48:34
What I will be commenting about may seem a little off topic here but then again………..
Months ago , RPK commented in another article that anyone who seem to show some dissent to Pakatan or the member parties, will be screwed up and down. And now it seems I have to agree with RPK that thats what is happening. It does seem like no one in PKR or DAP or PAS can do no wrong as far as some PR supporters are concerned.
Does it not begin to look like we are exchanging BN for another version of BN i.e.PR, if the country does vote out BN? The SOP and Modus Operandi of PKR is starting to look very familiar – very UMNO like. Then what about LGE shooting his mouth off about “give telur” to BN. Sounds very familiar, remember what the bastard Toyo said to the people of Selangor before GE12 —- lets make Selangor opposition zero state!
Don’t get me wrong, I am all for regime change what sort of change are we getting? I am a a very strong and staunch supporter of PR and in particular DAP, but even so I couldn;t help but flinch when I read the statement by LGE about telur for BN. Frankly, I think some PR supporters are just plain blind. We do need opposition, even if the opposition happen to be MCA or MIC or even UMNO. They may be crooks but we do need crooks to watch out for the other crooks, otherwise we, the ordinary folks will end up sending our women to Indonesia as maids not so far in the future.
Whether DAP or PKR or PAS, we must never forget that those people are politicians and one is sure next to a snake oil salesman, never trust a politician 100%!
MCLM was a good idea and it was meant to act as counter balance to BN and PR, unfortunately it never really took off. Too bad for the rakyat.
written by petman, March 19, 2012 15:40:27
Unlike some others, I did notice the by-line and realised you were not the author of this article. However I’m clueless as to who Parlimen Selangor is. Care to shed some light?
written by Super Admin (RPK), March 19, 2012 15:02:26
Dear AzizKadir2u and panca, the above article was not written by me nor was it posted by me. One of the two lovely girls who assist me with the updating must have posted it. When I woke up from sleep at 5.00am this morning I saw it.
written by AzizKadir2u, March 19, 2012 14:28:53
What RPK telling us is not very good if proven true. We knew YM RPK a good guy with lots of integrity. He has lots of respect for PAS and DAP even they are not perfect, there are room for improvement. So, now, we have a choice between PKR and Umno, comparing bother, we knew the following facts, :
1) Umno is proven, they are dominating and all the recent 30 years politics under Umno is not good and very bad for Malaysia, proven beyond reasonable doubt. There is just too much corruptions in all the levels, worst is the Minister and the top divisional leaders of Umno and BN. [[[ *** If Pakatan is the same, no difference anyway? *** ]]]
2) PKR, they are relatively new, and what is being said by YM RPK is not good, but we dont really have a hard fact and data to pin on them.
3) PR as a whole seem to have a good balance of power between PAS, PKR, DAP etc, and it is at least
not as dominating (PKR not as dominating over like the Umno hegemony), as such, there is probably some check and balance, as compared to the BN model, entirely rule and dominated by Umno.
comparatively, PR vs BN, PR is a better model for now.
4) As such, given if PKR is same as Umno, we at this point in time, shoule still give the benefit of doubt
to PKR, that is to say, directly compared BN vs PR, we should always choose PR, unless we have a
very good BN candidate.
5) if we have a choice between PKR vs Umno, we should choose PKR, as the Umno is proven with
track record, we Malaysia dont need to repeat, that is corrupt and NFC cowgate proven again again,
BMF scandal, Dato Zakaria very rich counselor of very big palace in Klang. Dato K Toyo, very rich and
big palace, all menteri2 and PM, very rich sons, no need to work also.
6) so, we rakyat must focus, PR and PKR not perfect, not the best on earth, but given the choice for now
we should : Umno vs PKR we choose PKR. BN vs PR, we should choose PR.
Zaid Ibrahim is good, Tengku Razaleigh is good, Abdul Kadir Sheid Fadzil is good, we can have them
help rakyat. focus, we rakyat must focus, pakat, and rakyat pakat.
written by ck, March 19, 2012 13:42:03
Display goat head, sell dog meat – Chinese saying
written by freedomfighter, March 19, 2012 13:30:56
I believe a lot of people already know that PKR’s modus operandi is the same as UMNO. Power determines how much $$ they will get. Those not aligned shall be sent to oblivion. Rakyat determines our conuntry’s leaders. What is stopping you to vote for clean BN or Pakatan leaders? If it causes a hung parliament, let it be. Belgium was at the same status and they still survive. But, at least we know those in the parliament are clean leaders. Parties from Borneo land might then be able to play their cards more easily to the benefits of their people.
written by Loyal Malaysian, March 19, 2012 13:20:18
My oh mY!! What shit abounds within the PKR!!
Perhaps it is not that bad a thing that the UMNOputras looks set to sweep the PR from Selangor.
It’ll give them time and cause for reflection what went wrong if that be the case!!
written by Kaneeneh, March 19, 2012 13:09:54
Everyday we are forced to choose the lesser of the two evils.
Let’s take out the old evil and deal with the new one later.
One problem at a time.
written by panca, March 19, 2012 12:57:03
Thank you Bro Pete for the well deserved dessert!
Pakatan consists of 3 parties and I will vote for reason I know what party and who I have voted and will vote for the same that deserves the power of the people and he who has my vote has my trust and confidence in him that I see him doing his duties.
written by TILAKASIRI SIMON, March 19, 2012 12:55:37
The GE13 is looming above our heads. But at the rate people are finding faults with PR, there is not much chance of winning the elections. What a shame it’s going to be after all the hard work by so many people.
written by englandmaripunya, March 19, 2012 12:49:14
Parti KEADILAN Rakyat. Cakap tak serupa bikin!! Where is your sense of fairness and justice?
It’s amazing how arrogant you’ve become. You are merely giving ammunition for BN to wrest away the seats you have started to take for granted. Don’t underestimate the voters. We can wait another 4 years till you get your act together. Right now, let’s just keep the 5 states and deny BN the two-thirds.
written by alfchuah, March 19, 2012 12:22:30
Well well well, there you go, you blind ABU supporters. PKR can’t even settle its own matter at home how can you expect it to work with DAP & PAS to run 13 states and 2 FT’s? It’s also been pointed out that those are in power now haven’t got the credibility – is that what we want in our future government? People who don’t know what they are doing and talking about, but only an appetite for $$$$?
Zaid Ibrahim may be crazy and eccentric, but I support a man with principle over a man with principle for $. The same goes for RPK. PKR already is a party that indulges in cronyism and hello – kettle meets pot??!?!? Do you think this little monster won’t grow up and become UMNO when it gets into power?
For all the ABU supporters out there, I’m not opposing to the idea of a 2-party system for check and balance. If the other party is not too dissimilar to the original party, aren’t we screwing ourselves and getting no pleasure at all?
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]
That is why there is 3rd Force. Talk talk talk, so where are the 20 candidates that MCLM is fielding, who are they? Which constituencies, and who to contact when your ‘People’s Parliament’ site run by Tengku Dr,. Haris is just filled with ra-ra article writers who aren’t doing anything (other than writing articles), or meetings are always in some far off land? No canvassing or setting up of any offices IN MALAYSIA? Then this is another form of b.s. . . . RPK’s articles are vaguely informative but without concrete action, the MCLM is no more reputable than Pakatan. Nothing concrete so how will the people vote for 3rd Force? BN has the mandate to grant :
1) Freedom from Apartheid/Fascism
2) Freedom from Religious-Persecution/Religious-Supremacy.
3) Equality for all ethnicities and faiths in all aspects of policy, Law and Constitution.
How about putting an end to all these problems by granting the above 3 items BN?
Are Pakatan Lawyers That Incapable? – Tay Puay Chan – Monday, 19 March 2012 13:10
I find it amusing that the Menteri Besar of Selangor Khalid Ibrahim along with his excos find no qualms in splurging thousands of if not hundreds and thousands of Ringgit Malaysia (after conversion of GB£1 = RM4.844) from rate-payers’ funds to seek advice from an international London-based legal firm to resolve its stalemate with the federal government on the water industry.
Malaysian advocates & solicitors are qualified
In 2006, when a request was made to the High Court for Cherie Blair, the spouse of former British Prime Minister Tony Blaire to represent construction company Fawziah Holdings at the Federal Court, the Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Wan Afrah Wan Ibrahim ruled that although Cherie Blair is an eminent Queen’s Counsel, she has not satisfied Section 18 of the Legal Profession Act 1976, that is, she has special qualifications or experience of a nature not available amongst advocates and solicitors in Malaysia. At that time, besides the Attorney General, even the Bar Council and the Kuala Lumpur Bar Committee (KLBC) objected to her application.
The ruling by Justice Wan Afrah clearly indicates that Malaysian advocates and solicitors do have the special qualifications, experience and skills needed to represent the Selangor state government. Members of the legal profession residing, practising in Selangor state as well as other Malaysian states would best understand local issues.
A foreign-based legal firm would have to research the matter before giving his legal qualified counsel. All these is time-consuming (besides revving up the scale on legal costs borne by Selangor rate-payers) as the foreign lawyers would need to comprehend and adjust Malaysian norms, customs besides the law and issues surrounding the federal-state water tussle.
Our questioning the Selangor government’s dependence on a London law firm for legal counsel is not an argument about battling the legacies of post-colonialism or an East versus West debate.
Our objection is based on the Selangor government discarding the ability of its own state legal team, its own lawmakers elected at both state and federal levels, and other advocates and solicitors who are ordinary members or office bearers in all parties i.e. DAP, PKR and PAS forming the Pakatan coalition.
Do Pakatan lawyers know the law?
This move by the Selangor government is an indictment of the talentless, inadequacies of Pakatan members, party office bearers who are registered with the Malaysian Bar Council advocates and solicitors and legislators who draft Bills, Acts, Enactment, that they become reliant on foreign labour (skills).
TAY PUAY CHAN is MCA Legal Bureau Chairman
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]
So does this mean MCA is going to end APARTHEID and implement Articles 1 and 18 of the UNHCR? Pakatan lawyers flounder about to collude better AGAINST the Rakyat. The self serving creeps are not incapable, they are witholding democracy and refusing to amend laws etc. because the profit oriented flaws in the system are what makes lawyers rich and allow suppliers to collude on AGAINST the taxpayers not directly involved . . . and too many are too selfish to want to change the laws out of duty to government much less Malaysia or even mankind. (That includes BN lawyers and Malaysian Bar Council and the Malaysian Judiciary who seem not to know that APARTHEID is illegal to practice by UN signatory countries like Malaysia . . . all foreign Universities in the 1st World should withdraw these inactive and colluding, 3rd world minded ‘legal-junta‘ in the 3rd World of their degrees!). Vote properly you citizens, or run for candidacy and vote for yourselves!
Chinese-Jewish Malaysian Parliamentarian ~ Teresa Kok Suh Sim? – Friday, February 10, 2012
Now, isn’t this interesting? How many Malaysians know that we have a Chinese-Jewish Parliamentarian in the person of the DAP Seputeh MP Teresa Kok Suh Sim?
I happened to learn of this matter when I browsed AAKJ’s blog here where he headlined about Teresa Kok promoting forbidden food to Muslims!
Naturally such a provocative headline like that would grab my attention and up to now, I had not learned of the existence of the Chinese Jews!
So, in a sense, Thank you AAKJ for enlightening me. Terimakasih bro! Surely, such a fact would have been unnoticed if not for the advent of social media and the availability of Google Search engine which really makes it all so easy for us to do some bit of investigative research just about anything and anyone!
No wonder that Teresa is always there at the frontlines whenever anything concerning the Jews or the Christians are involved? [[[ *** The term for this is ‘Religious Fifth Columnist’ . . . *** ]]]
Wish we had our Muslim MPs with that much of commitment and perseverance to look after the welfare and safety of the ummah!
I’m going to study more about this Chinese-Jewish thingy and learn as to who they are, what makes them tick and what is their agenda at large apart from stealing Palestine from the true sons and daughters of the soil there?
Such a thing is already happening here in Bolehland but the Malays are too divided and in deep enmity against each other to take notice!
They are going to wake up one day and wonder where the hell has their Tanah Melayu disappeared to?
As it is most of the ‘Malay Reserve Lands’ has already changed hands using the ever available proxies. Read about it here. The Star newspaper reported on the issue here about foreigners buying up such lands using such tactics.
As we all know, quite a large number of the Malay landowners are notorious for selling out their ancestral lands to others only to make a hue and cry about it once they start realizing that the damage has already been done! I don’t even want to start writing about the ‘Waqaf’ lands… That’s gonna make so many hearts bleed. Muslim hearts that is..
For now, let’s study about this Chinese-Jewish DAP MP! Pretty interesting subject!
Don’t you agree? Published by MAHAGURU58 at 4:26 PM
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]
No surprise. All the chapchong literal and figurative, also political stances and types, etc., in Pakatan anyway. Theresa quite worryingly could be a brainwashed or contrived personality placed indirectly by Mossad. DAP = PAP = Zion? Israel the country may not be Zionist run though (Zionism is a form of apartheid btw) so unless the world wants to deal with a second Nazi in the form of Zionism, better know who is linked to who wherever. Sovereignty and autonomy is too important to drop. China should have an opinion on this, though why the BRICS should give up their side of the world or not even compete to control or at least keep neutral the rest of the world does not register at all. WW3? Iran would simply irradiate the region and Israel would not escape radiation. And then there’s the very ‘Jewish feel’ half blood prince RPK (the communication style and attitude are inescapable if you ask moi.) . . .
Then again if that really happens, USA would probably not even bother with clean ups (i.e will drop Israel though probably will give them Green Cards) because internal problems in USA are too severe and an irradiated Chernobyl style Middle East means at very least 50 years unliveable up to 50,000 for the heaviest elements which is what is being used in nukes of the day. Overkill is what nukes are, a handful of this current generation of nukes means the world, not just the Middle East, will be unliveable and sickened for decades due to the even more dangerous high quality and extreme distribution by the 1000s of times more powerful (1mt = 1000 kt, 50 mt = 5000kt) – and wide spreading nukes compared to Hiroshima and Nagasaki type nukes . . .
If 10km quarantines were needed for 1940s bombs and 20MT equivalent Chernobyl equivalent irradiated 300-500km, a single bomb like ‘Mike‘ 1000 times the size of a Hiroshima Bomb at 10MT but throwing particles upt to 100 times higher could potentially cause 10 times the radius worth of irradiation. This would easily mean a 3000-5000km radii of contamination . . . . So what happens with just a handful of that type of nuke fired between 2 countries 5000kms away not even a WW3? A handful of times as much radiation multiplied? The irradiation from the fallout would destroy every life form especially the people living in the firing nation’s lands, including any nations up to 5000km away . . . that would be the USA across the Atlantic and all the way to as far as Japan – just because Israel or Iran use a Mike sized nuke.
Weather patterns are not static and in a year or few at most that radiation will reach whatever nation that fired even if ‘downwind’ . . . whats the point, so what if any nation has nukes? Those can’t even be used! 1 megaton could already very well destroy the ecosystem no end world wide . . . but a bomb will spread much further . . . ) much less 50 megatons or Uranium or Plutonium with a half life of 50,000 years. Stick to conventional weapons at least and dismantle those unusable nukes, the Geneva Convention could otherwise simply implement new laws to require all countries to not use these radioactivity intensive weapons. Or at very most stick to nukes no larger than the ones used on Japan in the 1940s. The below link has a conventional weapon that at least does not spread health wasting radioactivity across the world :
Stick to conventional weapons! Update the Geneva Convention! And please help those activists fighting for democracy in the 3rd World for simpler causes like ending apartheid or minority demographic rights, the human rights abuses and disenfranchisement are terrible . . .
3.5 Commentary Response Mini Article
Commentator comments :
“Our armed forces are not the thirteenth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third…We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…We have the capability to take the world down with us, and I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”
—Martin Van Creveld, a professor of military history at Israel’s Hebrew University.
“What would serve the Jew-hating world better as repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a nuclear winter? Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens? For the first time in history a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?”
– Professor David Perlmutter, writing in the Los Angeles Times, April 7, 2002
You worry about ‘Malay Reserve Lands’?
This won’t be the biggest problem.
Saturday, 11 February, 2012
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]] to @Andreas’ comments :
Wheres that Khinzirim army to scare(slaughter) the sh1t out of all the ill intended who want to Dhimmify? Nukes are no fun, nanotech is ‘grey goo’ dangerous, bio-chemical is too destructive. Use conventional (cap the war machine at heavy infantry at most via some sort of update to the Geneva Convention, anything else especially modern missiles are too destructive, mutual assured destruction – one missile for each city and whjats left? Stone age with massive displaced populations – you can see what mere mortars or land mines already do . . . ) as if this was the 1940s. But 100 million Khinzirim swamping the world would be something memorable in the history books i.e. ” Israel with genetic science, unleases Khinzirim Horde (Human-Boar Hybrid) Clan Gammorean was the first among many hybrids created to end competitition from the Sardaukar, Saudis I mean, hey Iran might be bypassed entirely if there were a Persiatic Padishah Emperor . . . should be very interesting reading . . . IF Iran’s seeks the older ways of the Ugarit Pantheon, that stood peacefully alongside other powers in the ancient world . . . (Incidentally the dead from battle probably would leave a good meal of ‘Gamon Ham’ as well, could solve the food shortage problem for the non-kosher world who are not enemies of Israel.)
Iranian Crown Jewels The Naderi Throne
Many cultures show their diversity in the traditional architecture, dances, and traditions in one’s country. Iran displays part of its rich culture and history through the Iranian Crown Jewels.
The Iranian Crown Jewels, also known as Imperial Crown Jewels of Iran or of Persia, is a collection of items passed on from generation to generation of rulers in Iran. Most of the items date back to 1500 A.D., when the Safavid dynasty acquired most of what is part of the current collection. These items were used up to the last dynasty in Iran, the Pahlavi dynasty, which was overthrown in 1979. There are many items within the collection: crowns, thrones, tiaras, swords, shields, other unusual items. Most notable of these are the Syamantaka-mani, the gem encrusted Peacock throne, the Samarian Spinel, and the bejeweled globe. Some items which were once part of this massive collection, like the Koh-i-Noor, before becoming spoils of war and were consequently taken by other owners. The Syamantaka-mani is among the largest gems in the world and now held illegally amongst the British Crown Jewels after it was seized by the East India Company and was presented to Queen Victoria, then Empress of India, in the year 1877.
The Peacock Throne, usually confused with the one in India, used to be called Sun Throne. However, after Fathali Shah’s subsequent marriage to Tavous Khanoum Tajodoleh, the name was changed. Tavous, in Persian, is the word for peacock. The Samarian Spinel is a 500 carat spinel gemstone and is from India. Uniquely, the Samarian Spinel has a hole in it, which once held a diamond (stolen?). It is also said that this was once an adornment to the biblical golden calf. The jewel-studded globe, standing in a height of 44 inches, is covered with thousands of gemstones. Water is shown by emeralds while land is shown by rubies and spinels. However, there are countries shown in diamonds such as Iran, Britain, France, and parts of South Asia.
These items are only part of the vast collection of Iranian Crown Jewels which are on public display at the Central Bank of Iran.
[[[ *** RESPONSE *** ]]]
The STOLEN gem ‘The Syamantaka-mani (and others taken from the Peacock Throne) should be filed for by Iran in an international lawsuit, along with a formal charge comprising Legal Counsels to reacquire (with damages) the Abu Said’s Black Prince Ruby, the Star of India, the Star of Africa, the Cullinan, Spring Palace treasures from China and so many others jewels taken under duress during the Colonial occupations round the world. Little wonder why Iran has such poor relations with the English. The English stole and hold ILLEGALLY a part of the sovereign property of so many countries and must be made to return the stolen goods. Will the International Criminal Court backed by Interpol help these countries retrieve their stolen treasures? The Commonwealth thus by association is giving tacit approval to the violent colonialists and should also ask that these treasures taken under duress while colonised be returned. Iran could spearhead this movement in a high profile manner that will shame the English and give a sense of righteousness to Iran (barring any human rights abuses within Iran) that will ‘de-justify’ any pre-emptive strike on Iran itself. If Iran does not thorw the first punch, Iran would very well eventually take over the Middle East especially if the above cultural considerations are applied.